The ECCO reactor looks very not professional. The use of material quality is also very uncertain. ECCO Reactor Does it really work? thank you all
RE: ECCO - When is Molybdenum not Molybdenum?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
ECCO - When is Molybdenum not Molybdenum?
Sometimes the most important discoveries happen due to serendipity - knowing what was used where is the most important thing when understanding outcomes.
The reactor was designed and its manufacturing could be controlled - however, many researchers across the world rely on their material suppliers to NOT be lying about, or mis-representing what they supply. 'Professional' organisations can be victim of this also.
With around a million dollars spent on developing ECCO, it is extremely cheap by standards in the field, so on that measure it could be considered amateur, however, it is still a lot of money and the outcome is what is important.
The material supplier, who apparently is quite respected, has been the unprofessional party in this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I saw your latest video on YouTube. Are those powders taken from the reactor? The neutron bubble detector seems to have detected neutrons. Thank you ！
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It has, we will do a background test after the radiographic plate exposure.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is best to detect these powders using gamma spectrometers and He-3 neutron detectors.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, don't have any here. Got a gamma, beta, alpha detector on way. Might approach University
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit