It does not matter how smart you are, once you delve into the field of Physical Cosmology, you must be ready to ask questions and also be ready to end up with them unanswered. Our Universe is so large that there is just no other way around it. It is even a wonder that scientists have been able to uncover so much about the mystery of the Universe. Physical cosmology studies the dynamics of the Universe especially about its origin, structure, nature, evolution, and ultimate fate. Underlying all these concepts is the concept of time.
No matter which aspect of the Universe we want to study, we must do it with respect to time. This post is about the beginning of time (if there was one), the key things that have happened to our Universe since then, and the end of time (assuming there was a beginning).
Time
Apart from saying that time is the ticking of the clock, candid response to what time is, is that we do not know and this has been the state of knowledge on the subject for many thousands of years. It is easy to fall into the temptation of thinking that you know what time is because it is something we deal with every day. We know its properties such as its being directional and our inability to turn it back. However, a compact definition of time is surprisingly elusive. Over the years, scientists, religious leaders and philosophers, have attempted to define it. Among the best definitions, in my opinion, are:
Time is a continuum that lacks spatial dimensions (Encyclopaedia Britannica)
Time is what prevents everything from happening at once (John Wheeler)
Time is a linear continuum of instants (Adolf Grünbaum)
It was between 1905 and 1915 that Albert Einstein's theories of relativity which helped us change the way we viewed time from Newtonian absolute time to relativistic time. He realised that time was not an independent variable on its own. Instead, it is the fourth dimension of space-time continuum (in his special relativity in 1905) or the fourth dimension of a dynamically curved space-time(in his general theory of relativity). Whether we view time from the standpoint of special relativity or from the perspective of general relativity, it is pretty obvious that time is inextricably interwoven with space and both are a fundamental fabric of the Universe.
The Beginning of Time
Human beings had thought that our Universe had been there forever. If that were so, then according to Albert Einstein, time should also have been there forever. However, the evidence that scientists and cosmologists have uncovered all suggest that the Universe has a beginning which is about 15 billion years ago. This is a pretty significant discovery when you consider the timescale of the Universe compared to human life. But wait a minute. If our Universe is that old and we have been here that long, why are we not more advanced biologically and technologically? Well, it turns out that we have not been around for very long. It appears that human beings have only existed in the Universe for just a few thousand years. So if there was a beginning, does that mean there would be an end? And what was there before the beginning?
Majority of our discovery of the age of the Universe has to do with Vesto Slipher's measurements of radial velocities for galaxies, providing the empirical basis for the expansion of the Universe.[3]
Measurement of the expanding Universe has been done, and it is apparent that galaxies are steadily moving away from each other. A plot of this separation and extrapolating to the past reveals that our Universe has not been static and that the galaxies get closer and closer as we move into the past. Without considering the effects of acceleration due to gravity, this plot would result in a straight line that reduces the space between galaxies to zero sometime around 20 billion years ago. But acceleration due to gravity should make the galaxies come towards each other due to Newton's law of gravitation. If this is so, then it means that gravity has been working against the expansion. Therefore it took the Universe less than 20 billion years because gravity bends the graph of the separation downwards bringing our estimate of the beginning of time to about 15 billion years ago. At this time, all there was in the Universe would be bound together, one on top of the other. Excellent.
Out of Nothingness?
If you are not a religious person, you would wonder what was before the beginning of time. Agreed, everything was bound together in what scientists like to call a Singularity but what was there before the singularity. Suffice it to say that if there were nothing before the singularity, there would still be something now. The fact that there is something now is proof that there was something before the singularity. That we cannot say what that something was is nothing of which to be ashamed. Humanity ought to congratulate herself on how much we know about our universe or at least how much we think we know. But if you are a Christian, hey, it is a no-brainer: In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth. It does not get simpler than that.
The Big Bang
At the Singularity everything that existed was balled up together.
Since the Big Bang, about 13.8 billion years ago, the Universe has passed through many different phases or epochs. When you consider the state of the universe before the Big Bang, it is easy to imagine that the changes that took place a second after the Big Bang were much more than the changes that the Universe has experienced ever since.
There is no other way things could have been because one moment we have a pretty condensed universe with infinite density, and the next second we have an expanding universe with the four fundamental forces. The four forces were possibly unified into a single fundamental force and in less than the time it takes to make a sandwich, the force of gravitation separated from the other fundamental forces and our Universe is just about of a room. It is not tenable to examine all that happened during that time in one post. But the question most people are interested in is this: if time has a beginning, does it mean that it will have an end? Will our Universe one day start contracting and possibly return to another singularity, ending all life in it?
We now know much about our Universe from the formation of galaxies to the expansion of these galaxies away from each other. But the galaxies alone do not tell the whole story because the visible portion of our Universe is made possible from calculations of the gravitational forces in it. But the visible part of the Universe is just about 4% of the Universe. Another 26% is estimated to be made up of a substance called dark matter which neither emits light nor allow any form of electromagnetic energy to escape it. Apart from this, the galaxies keep speeding away from each other such that the gravitational force could not slow it down. Therefore up to another 70% of the Universe is presumed to be made up of energy which is capable of causing this increase in separation. This is called dark energy.[1]
From our current understanding of how the Big Bang might have progressed and the things we have learned ever since, there are several predictions about the fate of the Universe, all of them bleak.
The Fate of the Universe - Possible End of Time
Well, it turns out that the fate of the Universe under the Big Bang would depend on the shape of the Universe.
Closed Universe: If the Universe was closed, the theory is that gravity may one day, overcome the acceleration of the galaxies and cause the Universe to begin to contact until another singularity known as the Big Crunch which is opposite of the Big Bang. However, new theories assume that this is not a likely fate of the Universe because there is quite enough dark energy in the Universe and its repulsive force is enough to keep the Universe expanding forever.
Open Universe: Avoiding all the math, if the Universe is open, that is negatively curved, then the Universe could expand forever with gravity having a negligible effect on the rate of expansion. In this case, the ultimate fate of the universe is either a Universal Heat Death, the "Big Freeze" or the "Big Rip" which is a situation where the force of the dark energy overcomes the effects of the fundamental forces and the Universe tears apart.
Flat Universe: here also, the Universe is expected to continue expanding but at a slower rate due to the effects of gravity. Eventually, the fate of a flat Universe is the same as the fate of an open Universe.
None of these theories is conclusive about the Ultimate Fate of the Universe because we always have to consider the effects of dark energy, gravity, the shape of the Universe and many other unpredictable variables. But if anybody knows what is going to happen eventually, Stephen Hawking should know, and according to him, the Universe will eventually collapse again but time will not go in reverse. Time will keep going the direction it is going, and we shall continue getting older until the end.[5] But as my daddy used to tell me, "Relax, we won't be here when it happens!"
Thank you for reading!
[An Original Content by @churchboy]
References
- CERN | Early Universe
- Physics of the Universe | Big Bang Timeline
- Wikipedia | Vesto Slipher
- NASA Archive | The Universe
- Hawking | The beginning of Time
If you write STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) related posts, consider joining #steemSTEM on steemit chat or discord here. If you are from Nigeria, you may want to include the #stemng tag in your post. You can visit this blog by @stemng for more details. You can also check this blog post by @steemstem here and this guidelines here for help on how to be a member of @steemstem.
Very good explanations. Hardwork content.
And also i like to say that;
Time is the actions of everything in universe in atomic level. And its a continium which we can change direction but cant change the already happened complated action.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for your definition of time. I have struggled with the best definition of time. I appreciate that you had the patience to read my post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good post and full of science. According to what we know, we are all old, we have a record of the past but no future, nothing in the laws of physics that takes time to move forward and that means there is the possibility of time moving backwards in the universe. In trying to solve the puzzle of why time moves in a certain direction, many physicists have settled in entropy, the level of molecular disorder in an ever-increasing system.
But two groups are divided into forms that may have created the arrow of time and after rising two different directions. When the Big Bang created our universe, this physicist believed also created a mirror universe in which time moves in opposite directions. From our point of view, time in the parallel universe moves backward. But anyone in the parallel universe will sense the time of our universe as retreating.
When the particles then divide outward, they perform two different temporal directions. Barbour and his colleagues created a 1,000 point model of simple particles from the universe that demonstrate this excess by creating gravity structures in both directions. Physicists call the time before the expansion of the "Janus point" after the two-headed Roman god. "It was something pre-existing", Barbour said. "The direction and flow of our time must be from what happens in the universe.When we look at it like that, it's natural to say the start time at the center point and flowing away in opposite directions".
Thaks you...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hello, fellow steemian. You make some interesting points that I, quite frankly, am in contention of, from a philosophical perspective. So, respectfully ~ As for time moving in any direction. Can you point in that direction? Which way does the arrow of time point?
The future is not a vector. Time does not move. Entropy is a falsehood and denies the laws of thermodynamics which state energy cannot be destroyed, it can only change form.
Too many physicists speak bs and get away with it simply because they are physicists.
Physics is meant to be the study of that which is physical, observable and measurable. Parallel universes are the stuff of science-fiction and are not observable or measurable. Water flows and its flow is measurable and the physical properties of that flow can be felt. Time has no physical properties and therefore does not flow. Time just is.
Peace
#daemon-nice
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for taking the time to respond. I agree with you that time just is.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for your comment. Theoretical physics is sometimes conjectures because of the massive scales that physicists have to deal with. Some say that there is an imaginary time which extends beyond the moment of the Big Bang and could explain the conditions that led to the Big Bang. According to them, the imaginary time is finite but without boundary conditions.
Well, time seems to have direction because it seems to link the past, present and the future but the theory of Relativity shows that time is not fundamental and it is relative to the observer. Of course, the implication of this is that we can go back in time, theoretically. When we do that, does it mean that we have reversed the direction of time or simply changed our position in it. I think that time exists because space exists and just like space, it is just "there".
Thank you for your comments. Much appreciated.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh my goodness! This is interesting. Good job boss @churchboy
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks my brother. Good to see you here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey Churchboy, great post as always.
My definition of time is ~ that which allows change to occur.
As you likely know by now, I believe Einstein is wrong, time is not dimensional nor is it relativistic. While I agree time is interwoven with space, unlike space, time does not have vectoral properties. Like the arrow of time, one hears about. Can you point in the direction of the arrow of time? No, I didn't think so.
Time is interwoven with space but so is motion. There is a trinity here. Everything that exists has motion at the atomic level. Everything observable and measurable has an electromagnetic signature. Em has two values; the size of the field and frequency; the smaller the field the higher the frequency, the larger the field the smaller the frequency. It is as they say an inverse relationship. This is the motion of the wave and a wave has three points; the beginning, the middle, the end and it is these three points which define a wave but if there were no time there could not be these three points and therefore no wave. Space has three vectors, height, length and width and these vectors require the existence of time otherwise space would just be a point.
I had never heard of Slypher, but I am familiar with Hubble and Abbes Lemaitre as well as redshift which is a point of contention for some of us.
It was Lemaitre who derived the Hubble Constant, though Hubble himself was not satisfied that Redshift was purely a doppler effect. Lemaitre needed redshift for he had already written his "Hypothesis of the Primeval Atom" which later Sir Fred Hoyle would derisively call "The Big Bang" and he(Lemaitre) posited that if his hypothesis is right that there should be some sort of expansion.
Hubble had an assistant by the name of Halton Arp and several decades later Arp published his Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies where he showed images of quasars and galaxies with vastly different redshifts attached by bands of matter and energy. He wrote a paper on it as well called Intrinisc Redshifts in Quazars and Galaxies. He proposed that redshift was part doppler effect but also a quality of an object's age. For this heresy, he was blackballed and lost all access to telescopes.
Photo by amateur astronomer David Strange
In the above image is one of his most famous because it took a public outcry on the internet to get it published(peer-reviewed) even though it clearly shows a bridge between two objects with very different redshifts. (Redshift scale is logarithmic) If Arp was wrong, why blackball him? Many scientists are wrong and do not receive such treatment. Was his an inconvenient truth? By the way, Arp was supported by Sir Fred Hoyle who, like myself, do not believe the Big Bang can even be considered a valid hypothesis simply because it is unfalsifiable allegedly being so far in the distant past.
if one takes a good look at the various BB theories the first thing one should see is that it is incredibly weak as a theory. It contains more "variable data" than "verifiable data". If it was a good theory then it would have more verified data than variable data. It is also approved by a Pope as a confirmation of Catholicism. It claims everything from nothing. Creatio ex nihilo as the Pope might put it. This approval by the Pope makes me squirm and think of Gallilee Galileo.
And as for gravity overtaking the universe in a closed system. Gravity is one of, if not the weakest of forces. The electric force is 10^39 times stronger and is actually what I believe drives the universe and gravity is an epiphenomenon of the electric force. Dark Matter don't matter no more.
Cheers to you my friend. Though I do disagree with some of the ideas, it is another well composed post by you.
Peace
#daemon-nice
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hahahaha. It took me a whole there to read your response to my post. As you may have guessed by now, I am not a cosmologist. I am one who is very curious about our Universe. While there are always holes to be picked in the existing theories concerning the beginning of the Universe, I try to discuss them as they are.
However, it is people like you who have independent, out-of-the-way thinking, who do not accept a way of thinking because of whose thinking it is, that help push the frontier of human knowledge ever forward. If everyone of the scientists mentioned here accepted every theory that was handed over to them, advancement would be impossible.
So thank you for sharing your perspective on time, its nature and its beginning. Thank you for your other contributions concerning the nature of our Universe. Perhaps one day, someone may be able to prove time to be separate from space and there would be evidence that you foresaw it to be so. You're appreciated.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have a better understanding of what time is. This is very informative. Thanks for sharing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks Bro. The distinction between the past, present and future is a stubbornly persistent illusion, Einstein said.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Dept Knowkedge...good post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You my dear are brilliant! 😋 awesome post seriously make more like this 💞
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you my wonderful, beautiful, lovely friend, Kristan. Did you see the story I write for you? I called it Dying Wrongfully. I even added a music video for good measure :). You bring out the best in people and I love you ❤️
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You made my day 😁
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Anything to make you smile. I'm glad you liked the story.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Being A SteemStem Member
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
:)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for sharing. Very interesting article.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
:)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Time? I do not believe there is time but what i think is there is day and night, there is only now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Man you are simply amazing in your post. Thank you for sharing this powerful piece.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit