RE: Why? Enlightenment, Information Theory, Noetics & the Strange Attractor--Eureka

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Why? Enlightenment, Information Theory, Noetics & the Strange Attractor--Eureka

in science •  7 years ago 

I'm not sure how much further you've taken this thought but I think my first post is possibly the underlying structure you wrote about 9 months ago?Lemmeknow what you think? Definitely check out something else called Emergence Theory! That basically aligns with your whole post here. But what I wanted to mention is that the handful of theories I use to model both objective and subjective reality are all predicated on the ubiquitous feature of something called #datalogic. Try as we might there is no logical way to have an experience of non-data or nothingness. Because of this logically verifiable fact we are able to deduce an inference of eternal significance. And yet, it remains as one of the tiny overlooked realizations of enlightenment regarding the How of reality? There seems to be an irreducible complexity to reality not unlike the common device known as a mousetrap. Remove just one of those components from its system and the whole device fails. At any rate we need people with deep thoughts and long attention spans to take a swing at the logic of our paper. We'd like to see epistemology hit the street level of understanding. My hope is that it can be simplified more and more into almost a meme status and eventually help structure the advent of an entirely new and unified ontology that covers the whole system I call the #Omniverse. You could be the spark that ignites the paradigm shift of #Omniphysics which is just waiting for your input and insights?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!