Categories and classifications of sciences

We will probably find distinctive solutions to this apparently harmless inquiry of what research means. A few people will state that they routinely research diverse online websites to locate the best place to purchase goods or services they need. Television news channels as far as anyone knows direct research as viewer polls on subjects of open interest, for example, pending decisions or government-supported projects.

Undergraduate students research the internet to discover the data they have to finish alloted projects or term papers. Graduate students dealing with research projects for a teacher may consider research to be gathering or breaking down information identified with their project. Organizations and consultants research distinctive potential answers for cure hierarchical issues, for example, a production network bottleneck or to distinguish client buy designs.

None of the above can be viewed as scientific research unless:

It adds to a body of science
It takes after the scientific method

What is Science

The word science is gotten from the Latin word scientia meaning knowledge. Science alludes to an orderly and composed body of knowledge in any zone of request that is gained utilizing the scientific method.

Image Source

2 Categories of Science

Natural Science - the science of naturally happening objects
Social Science - the science of individuals and its accumulations

Classification of Natural Sciences

Physical Sciences - comprise of disciplines, for example, chemistry, physics, and cosmology
Earth Sciences - comprise of disciplines, for example, geology
Life Sciences - incorporate disciplines, for example, science and herbal science

Classifications of Social Sciences

Psychology
Sociology
Economics

The natural sciences are not the same as the social sciences in a few perspectives. The natural sciences are extremely exact, precise, deterministic, and free of the individual mentioning the scientific objective facts. A scientific examination in physics, for example, measuring the speed of sound through a specific media or the refractive index of water, ought to dependably yield precisely the same, independent of the time or place of the test, or the individual directing the analysis.

In the event that two students leading similar physics analyze get two unique values of these physical properties, at that point it by and large implies that one or both of those students must be in blunder.

Image Source

The same can't be said for the social sciences, which have a tendency to be less precise, deterministic, or unambiguous. In the event that you measure a man's happiness utilizing a speculative instrument, you may find that a similar individual is more happy or less happy on various days and here and there, at various circumstances around the same time. One's happiness may change contingent upon the news that individual got that day or on the occasions that happened before amid that day.

There isn't a solitary instrument or metric that can precisely measure a man's happiness. One instrument may align a man as being more happy while a second instrument may find that a similar individual is less happy at a similar moment in time. At the end of the day, there is a high level of measurement blunder in the social sciences and there is significant vulnerability and little concession to social science strategy choices.

You won't discover numerous contradictions among natural scientists on the speed of light or the speed of the earth around the sun, however you will discover various differences among social scientists on the best way to take care of a social issue, for example, diminish global terrorism or save an economy from a subsidence.

Any understudy considering the social sciences must be aware of and OK with taking care of more elevated amounts of equivocalness, vulnerability, and mistake that accompany such sciences, which simply mirrors the high fluctuation of social objects.

Image Source

References:
Science
Social science
Natural Science