5 Reasons Why I think the Christian Religion is Man-Made

in science •  8 years ago  (edited)

I should preface this article by saying, I do not propose that only Christianity is man-made; I believe all religions are the product of man, but I happen to be raised in a Christian upbringing, and so this is my forte. After a year-long analysis of my faith and doctrine, one of the conclusions that I finally made (with the help of Hitchens and Dawkins), is that god did not create man, but man created god.


What kind of problems? Hatred and violence would be one of many.

This idea is not new; in fact there are numerous philosophers that surmised just as much, using only reasoning and observation to come to this conclusion. This here is my my personal "top five" reasons that I think concisely and irrevocably illustrates my justifications for saying that religion, or Christianity in particular is man-made.

5. The Biblical Creation Account

Let's review what we know about the Genesis creation story:

Day 1: God created the heaven (his territory, I presume) and the earth (the planet earth. With waters on its surface) and spoke light into existence. Evenings and mornings were created.

Day 2: God made the atmosphere. A notable feature of this atmosphere is the firmament, a cosmic divider which separated the waters from the waters.

Day 3: God told the water to move back, so that dry land may appear. From there, he made the whole of the plant kingdom.

Day 4: God made the sun, moon, stars, and every celestial body in the universe. And where did he put these things? In the firmament.

Day 5: God made sea and air animals, and he granted them permission to perform intercourse as they please.

Day 6: God made land animals, and he granted them permission to perform intercourse as they please. Oh, and he also made Adam and Eve. In his own image.

Day 7: It's finished. And god, the all-powerful deity who spoke the universe into existence, rested.


In a nutshell.

Do you notice something in this story? Does this seem realistic? Does this accurately represent the universe as we see it? No, of course not. Many will argue that Genesis isn't to be taken literally, but figuratively. But many of these Christians don't realize that that's just their opinion. They don't know that there are people who are so close-minded in scientific evidence and so firm on their faith in the Bible, that they chose to take every letter of the Creation story literally. All of it.

This is a destructive view. It is a slap in the face of science, history, archaeology, and reality, to have people teach this story as factual. In fact, it is quite evident that the structure of the Genesis creation account is very akin to a mythical story-telling perspective. Furthermore, there's no definitive agreement as to who really wrote the first five books of the Bible.

Clearly, this is a man-made story meant to be told only at Bronze Age eras, nothing more. If the beginning of your book is man-made, isn't that enough basis to suspect that the religion formed around this book is also man-made?

4. Original Sin

And God said, "I hereby declare that the sins of the parent shall be passed on to all of the generations of their children! Oh and by the way, they need my son to be saved. From myself." Sound familiar?

An all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good god made this decree himself; no interpretations, no wordplays, just pure, objective look at the bible verses. This unreasonable decree ensures that the people will beg-- yes, beg redemption and salvation from their curser. Yes, curser. Still not clear to you? God cursed all of humanity, then he demanded that we cure ourselves using his son. Neat, huh?

A nice business strategy includes giving the people the sickness, then selling out the cure. The Christian religion is a man-made business, and it's saddening that people just take this horrible concept like it's normal, and a good thing. Is punishing the children for the sins of the parent normal? Is it morally good to pass on the crimes of the parent to their innocent offsprings? If it's not, then God clearly is immoral.

3. "Man"-made religion

Yes, man-made. Not woman-made. The Christian religion was designed with a patriarchal dominance in mind. God was referred to as a "He". Eve was the first one tempted. Eve ate the fruit first. Many verses portray women as inferior, submissive, unimportant, and spoils of war. The more you read the bible, the more apparent it is that gender equality is certainly out of the equation here. Actually, the three Abrahamic religions have this in common: they portray women as inferiors!


I wonder what Christian women do with these verses. Cherry-pick them out, perhaps?

In the Old Testament, only men were recorded in genealogies. Men were always the head or leader. Men were allowed to have several women. Women were supposed to shut up and let the men do all the decisions. Women had constrained rights. In the New Testament, all of Jesus' disciples were male. Jesus said that the church was to be headed by Peter. The whole of Vatican is today controlled by men! In fact, the entire Christian powerhouse is dominated by men.

The Christian religion is a patriarchal corporation. Any Christian woman who wishes to have equal rights with men must first ask themselves, "What am I doing in a religion which seeks to promote my inferiority?"

2. The Bible and God

Inaccurate and inherently contradictory, this "divine book" was clearly authored by imperfect men. Let's take a look at Yahweh, the almighty bearded man in the heavens. As a start, this is not original. Ever heard of Zeus and Odin?


What is it about beards that makes these deities superior?

Next, why would an all-knowing, all-present god have to ask "where are you?" Why would an all-knowing god have regret? Why would an all-knowing god have to "remember" things? Why would a perfect god have jealousy? Why would a perfect god demand worship or sacrifice? Why would a perfect and all-good god keep anger forever? Why would an all-powerful god have incapabilities? Why would an all-powerful god have weaknesses? Why would an all-powerful god need to wait for some time to defeat an evil that shouldn't have existed in the first place?

It's all part of their business strategy.

Do you see that these attributes are clearly human-like? A God with god-like powers but human-like imperfections, can only exist in one place: In the minds of men.

1. The Vatican

One look at the glittering corridors of St. Peter's Basilica can immediately help us draw to a single conclusion: This is a man-made, patriarchal business corporation, and the whole of Vatican is their profit. Ever wondered why almost no believer can abide by this bible verse?

The biggest sect of all of christianity has all the luxury, all the benefits, all the resources, and they can't do this one simple piece of advice that their deity had said in their holy book. Why? Of course, they wont! Because you can't do business if you give away all of your earnings! The corporation would collapse in an instant!

You would think that they should be confident about that NOT happening, because they believe they had god on their side, but no no. They would rather stick to their money and gold and play it safe behind their walls, than to give all of it away to the less fortunate, and pray that their god somehow replenish their supply.

Does this show faith? Does this show unconditional charity? Does this show the ultimate goodness that their deity had been proclaiming?

Of course not. Because their deity is man-made, and their corporation is hanging on a slim hope that their people would not discover the true structure of their controlling agenda.

Image sources from Atheist Republic, We Fucking Love Atheism, and others.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Hi! I am a content-detection robot. This post is to help manual curators; I have NOT flagged you.
Here is similar content:
http://tigerfreethinkers.blogspot.com/2013/05/5-reasons-why-i-think-christian.html

  ·  8 years ago (edited)
Loading...

Without trying to sound all "Christian-ee", but the Holy Spirit is illogical. I 100% agree that faith and the bible are contradictory but I argue that it is the humanity in it that limit the logic. Not trying to save you but any person that uses logic would agree with you. But salvation goes beyond logic. I believe that is the reason for faith. The divine.

Hold up here ... faith and the bible are incompatible how? But yes definitely we have ample evidence to show that man's logic and perception are painfully flawed. If nothing at all else, the Bible is an amazing psychological guide to not losing your shit.

Best example I can think of: you can read about riding a bike or eating a cookie but you don't get the experience of the wind or the flavors. You can understand it but you don't have it. Similarly, you can read and understand the bible but I believe you can't truly love until faith is real in your life.

Let me ask something ... have you noticed that all of the observations in question are ones made with human sense organs, which are absolutely known to be horribly inaccurate? When it comes down to it, we infer reasoning based on almost nothing. We think there are upwards of 70,000,000,000 objects flying at us from outside the solar system because of ... one rock. And stars are all just like the sun because ... they twinkle. A longer twinkle means a planet and a planet must be where we are. Though we can't actually see it ourselves.

There's a lot of faith and invisible magic there, if you ask me. And yeah, science makes great predictions for very specific situations forced in lab environments. And that's the best we as human beings can expect to do. The thing I'm leaning at here ... is that the Bible is actually painfully accurate.

Each of the "punishments" for sins are clear warnings of psychological or social harm from your own actions, not threats from an angry man in the sky. The idea of us being created in the image of an intelligent creator is reasonable both religiously and scientifically, though neither answers where that creator came from. The Bible suggests there is no answer for that one, and science suggests the big bang came of literal nothing. Again, the answers are not different.

Lastly, the predictions of the Bible have been alarmingly on cue for the last 1400 years at minimum, and through to today. The third temple is in construction now, and those signs of it coming have happened. It looks a lot like the Bible and the older stories it's compiled from were written by somebody who's seen it before.

So fine. Man-made I guess. In that the Bible is the basis and it's a collection of previous writings, and only man writes. Still, my faith is unshaken and unquestioned by these thoughts.

The problem with Atheism is that it's a lie. You're projecting religious faith onto scientific papers instead. Those papers are fine, yes, but the thing is they hold no answers. They hold guesses and tests and well-written descriptions of what they might mean. But, in Atheism, you decide you have found proof of an absence of an entity. A thing that, to science, is an abomination.

Consider -- the average scientist goes through this as a phase. The greatest theoretical physicists usually eventually say they do think it was God who did it; they just want to know how.

Congratulations @neglect! You have received a personal award!

2 Years on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.

Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @neglect! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!