Science has entered a realm of complexity that makes a lot of it, especially in the social sciences or sciences like ecology, basically storytelling. That's why I tend to only read science media pieces that involve some observable discovery such as a new species or particle. It's the only way I'm sure I'm not reading a bunch of fluff.
RE: Scientific Evidence Shouldn't Dictate Your Opinion
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Scientific Evidence Shouldn't Dictate Your Opinion
I call social sciences "social engineering". i can't read anything really.
even with observable discoveries I always take them with a grain of salt. cosmology for example is trying to get into physics and the bullshit is easy to get entangled from one to the other.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree most social science is not falsifiable enough, and not clear enough. It's a mess for the most part. Their laziness ridicules all of science.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit