RE: Nuclear energy, fuel for the future or better left in the past?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Nuclear energy, fuel for the future or better left in the past?

in science •  6 years ago 

The disasters correlated with nuclear power are also worth the headlines but the sad thing is that the consequences of other fuels don't create these extreme events. They rather kill us slowly which reduces the 'need for immediate action'. Of course there are also people strongly against fossil fuels, but they often offer no immediate alternative other than 'we should consume less and place more renewables'. And that is great! really! And will eventually be our best way out, but it is not realistic for the current problems and needs as you already mentioned.

Thanks for stopping by!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!