It is believed that a Perpetuum mobile is impossible. Why? So the scientists said.
As far as I understand, "official science" refers to the law of conservation of energy - it is also the second law of thermodynamics. The problem with this law is only one - it is applicable only to closed systems. But in reality closed systems are not observed. In fact, it's impossible to create a closed system. In other words, the problem is not in the fundamental impossibility of perpetual motion, but in creating a sufficiently strong and durable engine.
So the phrase "perpetuum mobile is impossible" is dogma rather than the real law of nature. And I think that the usual windmill can be considered a perpetuum mobile).
Please correct me if you find an error in my reasoning.
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!