I completely agree. Many news networks make their money through advertisements. Scary headlines are just better at bringing in a larger audience. Many studies, not just one, are needed to determine the dangers involved in anything. I think any article making such a large claim should cite multiple studies to back up their point.
RE: [No BS edition] Does e-Cigarette smoke cause cancer? News outlets misleading people again
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
[No BS edition] Does e-Cigarette smoke cause cancer? News outlets misleading people again
They must! The bibliography is very important. And with good references! But we still need to produce a lot and get to know a lot to evolve in these areas. And that's just a hit and miss. They should and are not always, well-supervised so as not to be unethical and to endanger human lives.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit