Just passionate admirers of life, for example, Leibniz and Fiesch, Wright proceeds, could discover a reason for an outright positive thinking that expects an interminable existence of fretful movement.
Nobody yet an egotistical and hypochondriac admirer of accomplishment with a contempt of working for it, similar to Schopenhauer, could find in this assumption the defense of an outright critical way of thinking and a dismissal of the world. Subsequently the way of thinking of each extraordinary rationalist is the main piece of his history.
What recognizes the book "The History of Modern Philosophy" is that its writer frequently closes discussing the rationalist by communicating his own perspective on his way of thinking, so he gives the peruser an overall appraisal or some concise analysis that assists him with understanding the scholar better.
This is reflected in his scrutinize of Thomas Aquinas, who "assuming he had grown such a huge amount in the tasteful, that Dante would do it...in the Divine Comedy."