Here it is some few weeks after the clash of the titans.
The head titan has been slain in the minds of the people.
He as been vanquished from the throne, if not the throne room.
A new puppet has been installed.
All hail the new boss!
Same as the old boss?
It is time, dear reader, to take things into our own hands.
You don't have to throw any molotovs.
Just register your resistance to this attempted appeasement.
Nothing much has changed.
We still operate on proof of wallet.
The greedy whales are still taking their 'rightful' cut, despite the price feedback.
Hello, greedy whales! Get a grip!
A higher percentage of a less valuable coin results in having less in total??!
We are still held hostage by the few accounts above 500mv that would abuse it if the n2 reward curve, (ie, proof of brain) came back.
We know that some large whales stood up and defended the pool from them before.
But, they have been appeased, too.
Stinc has averted a fork by appeasing the most vocal rabble rousers with dance moves that amount to very little, so far.
'6 weeks from now we are going to consider some considerations, until then just keep eating crumbs minnows!'
Wtf???
Given enough time there won't be enough users here that even know the difference between being abused by bullies for profit and being rewarded for rewarding 'good' content.
As it is now, the newbs think this is the normal.
That works in the favor of proof of wallet.
All hail, stinc, et al, for their infinite wisdom!
At the time proof of brain was broken, and it's main proponent dismissed, stinc, in the form of ned, said, "We can always change it back.', to which the more cynical amongst us replied, 'sure we can'.
Well, here it is 2 years later, the price has been on the way down since it had to float on proof of wallet.
When do we go back to rewarding good content with financial incentives greater than linear rewards allows?
When does the community get a say in rewards more commensurate with their numbers?
Being valuable to the less than 70 accounts with more than 500mv is less valuable to steem than being valuable to the ~40k of us that post here every day.
If the 500mv soft cap was enforced, until the middle class here could dilute the votes of the whales a lot more, we could slowly raise that 250k usd influence limit.
I know that many of you that will read this subscribe to the popularity pool way of managing your lives, that worked well under the old rules.
Brown nosing was acceptable corporate behavior.
'It's just common sense.'
Climbing over the back of the less adept was just the price the losers paid.
The truth is being exposed, dear reader.
Propaganda may sell better, but it sneaks out of the room when reality shows up.
The new paradigm is nearly here.
If you haven't noticed, it's time.
Look around, dear reader.
The rhetoric of the anarchists is becoming mainstream.
We just need you to help nudge the snowball a little.
The edge is getting closer.
When this snowball goes, we will never have to worry about being ruled by bullies, ever again.
Our kids' kids will, we should leave it on the blockchain so that they learn from our taking responsibility to free ourselves.
At some point we will pass the point of no return, that is the point we must push for, imo.
You, of course, have to do what you do.
Dyor.
I couldn't imagine n^2 being fun, sureley the whales just have an insane ammount of influence. Ask yourself, why was it changed in the first place?
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I was here, i saw the n2 in action.
When the adult whales put an 800mv cap in place by flagging any vote over that level my nonexistant vote went to over .04sbd.
You just don't know how much the greedy f**ks are taking from the commons, daily.
99% of rewards go to the top 100 accounts.
A 500mv cap on voting gives those of us outside the top 70 a chance to get bigger crumbs.
The n2 causes stake to be held in fewer accounts and increases the value of each later vote.
If you werent here you won't know that, and imo, should push to find out for yourself.
'We can always change it back.' 0.o
For the record, the curve was changed because ned needed his ego stroked, imo.
Look where that has led us.
Ned got forced out, why hasn't his damage been reversed?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is socialism I see in the west, wrapped up in the term capitalism, it is pure capitalism on steemit, as I see it!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'd agree.
Now if we could just beat that,...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not sure enough people care on here, it mirrors life does steemit, people sink into comfortable places, like people that only write about peaodos, for the sake of family protection, then all the suck ups, that write steemit fan posts, knowing large investors, like theycall me wanker dan will up vote them, as he has his own motivation, his stake.
It mirrors real life here, it is hardly revolutionary, it never was, it just seemed it, when BTC was flying high, and that is still worth 3700 $ today, and steem 30 cents, wonder why eh!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It would help to untie this albatross from around our necks, for sure.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Here, try this on.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice one, cheers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit