Soft drinks? May be stroke

Companies use synthetic switlers to produce soft drinks with the confirmation of 'zero calorie'. It feels absolutely great to drink cold drinks in the summer. However, a recent study says that these soft drinks of artificially made sour drinks are at risk of various mental problems including stroke. However, despite the fact that all these dietary drinks and stroke risk increased, researchers could not determine the actual cause and effect relationship. That is why some experts have disputed this argument with the researcher.

Because of this study, researchers have found no relation to this type of health risk with sweet soft drinks, sweet soda, fruit juice and fruit drinks.

Matthew Pace, senior research fellow at the Neurology Department of Boston University School of Medicine, said that there are very little information on diet and health risks in our hands. This research is conducted on 2888 people aged 45 and 1484 in 60 years of age. But to be more confident about this, more research is needed. Because many people drink diet. It is therefore important to ensure their health risks.

Studies show that more than 60 years of age among people aged 60 and over are at risk of stroke and mental disorder. These problems are not very intense for people under 60 years of age.

In response to this report, the American Beverages Association said in a statement that global security authorities have been saying that low-calorie suistane-rich diet rich in soft drinks is more secure. In the statement that the security authority, including the FDA, World Health Organization, the European Food Safety Authority,

Head of Neurology Department of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Ralph Skao did a similar study. He said in a research on artificially sweetened diet drinks and vascular health, that such artificial sweetened diet will have an effect on the brain when going through the vasculular cycle due to drinking water. This report, based on a sample, was based on a study based on the data of people who were taken as samples. So there is no unanimous reason to accept this result as final.