Far away from the sun lies the Kuiper Belt, a collection of massive icy objects slowly orbiting the sun. These objects lie past the orbit of Neptune, with the belt's most famous resident being the dwarf planet Pluto. Think of the Kuiper Belt as a much, much, much larger asteroid belt, with much larger worlds contained within it. The objects here are coated in ices that would easily sublimate or melt if they were as close to the sun as Earth is.
Of the Kuiper Belt denizens, one of the strangest is Haumea. Haumea is a somewhat large dwarf planet (as wide as Pluto on one side!) with a strange quality: This icy world is shaped somewhat like an egg (or ellipsoid). However, rest assured that the egg-shaped nature of Haumea is just one of the unique things about this distant place above our heads.
Where is Haumea?
Like most Kuiper Belt objects, Haumea spends all of its time outside of the orbit of Neptune. At its closest approach to the sun (its perihelion), Haumea reaches a distance of about 35 AU from the sun - 35 times further away than we are from the sun. This is just outside Neptune's orbit, which lies at about 30 AU. However, like many outer solar system objects, Haumea's orbit is quite elliptical: With an eccentricity of 0.19 (0 means circular, 1 means parabolic escape trajectory), the planet can travel over 50 AU from the sun, slightly further than Pluto's maximum distance.
Haumea's orbit viewed from the side
Credit
At this distance, very little sunlight can reach Haumea, resulting in the place having an extremely cold average surface temperature of 50 Kelvin, or over -220 degrees Celsius.
Structure and Shape
As previously mentioned, Haumea is egg-shaped. This is not just a slight bulge. At its longest dimension, Haumea is 2300 kilometers across, which is almost as wide as Pluto. But, at its shortest dimension, Haumea is only around 1000 kilometers across. This huge width difference gives Haumea the shape of a flattened lead fishing sinker.
Rendering of what Haumea could look like
Credit
Even with one dimension being a lot smaller than the others, Haumea is still really big. It's about twice as large as the Asteroid Belt's resident dwarf planet Ceres, but falls short of outer dwarf planets Pluto and Eris. While it isn't possible to precisely measure Haumea's land area without better measurements, the best estimate of this land area gives Haumea more surface land than the entire continental United States. If you could visit, you would be able to walk around all of this land thanks to the small but still substantial surface gravity, coming in at around 4% of Earth's surface gravity on average.
Haumea vs Earth
Credit
The extremely cold temperatures of the Haumean surface mean that this surface is covered in ice. This ice is primarily water ice, along with many other compounds. The interior of Haumea is likely made of rock due to the planet's density.
Haumea's Spin
You may be wondering why Haumea is shaped the way it is. Ordinarily, once an object in space gets large enough, it will shape itself into a sphere via the force of gravity (the object has to be several hundred kilometers across for this to start happens). But while Haumea is clearly large enough to do this, it is also clearly not a sphere. What causes this?
The answer is its spin. Essentially everything in the solar system spins. Earth spins about once every 24 hours, giving us our day. Haumea on the other hand rotates at a blisteringly fast 4 hours. On Haumea, a single day passes every 4 hours. This is much faster than any other large solar system object observed. This rapid rotation stretches the dwarf planet, much like you can stretch a rubber band by spinning it on your finger with a weight attached. The result is the ellipsoid shape we observe.
Haumea Rendering
Credit
But why is Haumea spinning? The answer is probably a giant impact. A long time ago, something very large crashed in Haumea, fragmenting both objects and causing Haumea to spin more rapidly than anything else in the solar system. This impact also likely produced the Haumea collision family, a group of smaller Kuiper Belt objects with a similar composition as Haumea. These smaller objects (most of which are a few hundred kilometers across, which really isn't that small) were probably formed out of the impact debris.
Moons and Ring
Haumea still has a few unique things up its sleeve. The impact that split off dozens of country-sized rocks and sent Haumea reeling also created a few things that stuck around.
The collision gave Haumea two moons - Hi'iaka and Namaka. Namaka, orbiting Haumea about 25000 kilometers from Haumea's core, is probably over 150 kilometers across, while Hi'iaka in its higher orbit is much larger, coming in at around 300 kilometers. Both of these moons are probably too small to be spherical, but are much much bigger than moons like Mars' Phobos and Deimos. Having probably formed out of the Haumea collision, they are likely made out of the same material as Haumea itself.
Rendering of Haumea and moons
Credit
Despite being much smaller than Haumea, Haumea's two moons are still quite large, and likely offer much to be discovered once a spacecraft is eventually sent here.
Haumea also holds the distinct title of being the only dwarf planet with a ring system. Like Saturn, Haumea boasts its own ring: A ~5000 kilometer wide ring of scattered debris encircles the dwarf planet. This debris is either a leftover from the cataclysmic collision that caused Haumea's spin and shape, or is the result of a third moon of Haumea getting too close to the dwarf planet and being ripped apart by gravity gradient and tidal forces (Mars' inner moon Phobos may face this latter fate in the far future).
Even the enormous planet Earth doesn't have rings, making Haumea quite unique. I wonder how visible this ring(about 70 km wide) would be up close, and if it would make Haumea look like a very miniature, rocky Saturn. The Haumea ring discovery was only published a few months ago, by the way - a clear example that we aren't even close to finding out everything there is to know about the dark outer solar system.
Difficulties of getting to Haumea
This is the part where I would like to share some high resolution images of Haumea, to see just what this weird world looks like. Unfortunately, this is the best image of Haumea ever produced:
A real picture of Haumea and its two moons
Credit
Sadly, Haumea's massive distance from us along with its size makes it impossible to resolve any surface details using telescopes on Earth. The only way to produce decent images of this dwarf planet would be to send a spacecraft out to personally make a visit. A flyby of Haumea could be achieved using a mission similar to the New Horizons spacecraft that flew by Pluto, but would require a mission over a decade long just to fly past Haumea one single time. Actually orbiting Haumea and remaining in the vicinity of the dwarf planet would be an immense feat, either requiring half a century transit times or some extremely novel propulsion method.
Unfortunately there are no missions to Haumea planned that I know of. This world will remain under a veil of mystery until some space agency sends something out there. I very much hope to see what this place looks like some day when a spacecraft is eventually sent.
Let me know if you have any questions or comments about Haumea or my post. I don't think that this dwarf planet is very well known, despite being almost as large as Pluto (at least on one side!) and easily being a new planet if the IAU hadn't decided to be lazy about memorizing tons of new planets (I'm only partially joking ...), so I hope that you were able to get some new information from this post!
Thanks for reading!
Sources Utilized:
Caltech Haumea Page
THE SURFACE OF 2003 EL61IN THE NEAR-INFRARED - Trujillo, Brown, Barkume, Schaller, Rabinowitz
National Geographic: Dwarf Planet Haumea has a ring
Haumea Wikipedia Entry
Hi @proteus-h very well written. One of the strangest asteroids out there. It comes to perihelion in 2133 (!) so will be getting closer over the next century of more, so it will be interesting if there are any changes as it draws closer to the sun.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, I didn't know about it until now. It is nice to see that there is still so much to explore in the relative vicinity to our home.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@proteus-h, Well you learn something everyday. This is new to me and I am quite surprised I haven't seen it before, especially with a relevant degree haha.
Good job man. Followed ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think you are a fan of science fiction.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well I am a scientist.....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @proteus-h
Please check that all images used are CC0 compliant.
Thank you
(steemstem curator)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'll admit that I haven't been as diligent as I should be in choosing CC images (have just been making sure to credit the source). I will do my best to improve that situation in the future. Thanks for the support!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Being A SteemStem Member
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
nice follow me
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't think it is possible to read this entire post in the one minute between you commenting and me publishing this post. I hope you find the time to read through it later.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Savage😁😁😁
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
On what evidence do you base the conclusion that those lights in the sky are actually physical things?
?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, you can go look at close up pictures of one of them (Pluto) and all of its moons from New Horizons (some of the smaller moon images are pretty bad, though, so fair warning. Charon is great though). If you were to observe Haumea in the sky on several occasions you could calculate an orbit (using Gauss' method or others) around the sun. This orbit is uniquely determined, so by watching Haumea we know that it has to be out there in a certain orbital trajectory. The orbit itself is essentially based only on Newton's law of gravity.
Issue is that Haumea is really dim because it's very far away and somewhat small. That's why it wasn't discovered until about 15 years ago despite being as wide as Pluto.
Scientists have other ways to determine physical qualities other than low-res images. For example, Haumea's ring was discovered extremely recently because Haumea crossed in front a star. The brightness levels were measured and there were small dips on either side of Haumea, indicating the presence of a ring.
And of course, what could the lights be but physical things? Every light in the sky is a real place, big or small, star or planet or asteroid.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I disagree - that is an assumption. The images you referred me to (that are not renderings) are no more conclusive than 'the best image of Haumea ever produced'.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
But like I said, the image is just a tiny part of what we know about Haumea.
A star moves across the sky with a certain motion. If you observe the light three times, getting angles for each, and the time between the observations, you use Gauss' method to get an orbital position vector since we know that the object is orbiting the sun. Now we know the entire trajectory of the object and can predict where it will be in the future. From this we know the distance to Haumea. There's no assumptions here other than that gravity behaves the way it does and the mass of the sun. Anyone could do this given a telescope (although Haumea would be difficult as its quite dim, doing this for something like Jupiter would be totally doable).
Making assumptions about Haumea gives us approximate sizes based on how bright the surface is, since we know the distance. Observing how the brightness changes over time tells us that Haumea must be misshapen to account for changing brightness as it spins. Measuring the actual curves generated by observing the brightness locks down the actual shape.
Watching Haumea block out a star can tell us about its structure, its rings, and its moons. Spectroscopy can give us more information about its surface composition. Positions and speeds of the moons gives us information about their orbital trajectories. I would say that very very little can be discerned about Haumea from the picture included because other methods tell us much more.
If you are unconvinced that Haumea is a real place, take a look at the pictures of Pluto taken before 2015. They are hideous, with just a few pixels and almost no detail. Almost nothing could be discerned about Pluto from the terrible Hubble photos prior to the flyby. And yet, predictions about the size and number of moons were made that were confirmed to be correct when New Horizons flew by two years ago. Now that a spacecraft has passed by in a close flyby, we have high resolution images confirming things that were observed of Pluto prior to the flyby.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Still nothing to tell me this isn't fiction born out of active imaginations cooperating with each other, and possibly fooling themselves in the process.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What exactly would convince you then?
Haumea's distance can be determined, by anyone with a good enough telescope, using nothing but an algorithm derived from the gravitational force and kinematics. Same for any other planet or asteroid, or even the moon. Satellites using this principle are responsible for your television, your GPS in your phone, some weather forecasts, and possibly the internet connection you used to make this post.
What evidence would you need to be convinced?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The information I get from my telescope isn't conclusive either, as much as I enjoy looking through it. There is no way to confirm that the movement I detect represents an orbit. Any equations you apply are based on assumptions. The evidence that would convince me is not currently available to us, therefore you should not be convinced either.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This cosmos, the same for all that exists, was created by no god and no man, but always it was, is and will be forever a living fire, measures burning and measures extinct. I liked your post, good luck to you and have a good day.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
WOW! That is really crazy and amazing looking.. It's like it's impossible but hey, Cosmos is really interesting!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit