Let me start by saying that I'm in favor of the Steem Proposal System and that it can be beneficial to the sustainability of development on the Steem blockchain on the long run.
I've just read a short technical post about SPS by @smitop.
From the post, I became curious about one detail, something the author remarked and pointed out:
I don't know why, but if you've set a witness voting proxy, your votes don't count.
Why was SPS coded this way?
Most likely it was chosen as a convenient option... It was probably thought that the majority of accounts that have set a witness voting proxy would trust their witness proxy to vote for SPS projects too, since they will be mostly development-oriented, and regular folks will not easily understand what is involved to cast informed votes.
At least that would make some sense, otherwise it would mean their votes are simply ignored, which I doubt it's the case.
But what if they prefer to vote for SPS projects themselves, in a different manner than their witness proxy? Or choose a different proxy? After all, these can constitute two different areas of interest and two different ways of distributing the inflation.
Do you see this as an issue? Too late to fix it if it is? Or does it seem ok to you as it is? @blocktrades @ned?
If the SPS checks "can vote", creating the possibility of setting a different proxy for voting on proposals implies writing new code, thus introducing risks. Iterative development, piggybacking on the "can vote" check is much safer I think. It can be improved later
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree that writing new code this close to the hardfork implies risks. And leaving it to the next iteration is probably the safest way to go considering the moment in time we are in. But it should probably be addressed in the next iteration, it makes little sense to mix witness voting with SPS voting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree with you @gadrian.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you so much for participating in the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @gadrian!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.802 which ranks you at #4490 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 637 places in the last three days (old rank 5127).
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 193 contributions, your post is ranked at #26.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @gadrian! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit