I'm excited to see how the Steemit staff will address this. I think some of the scenarios like duplication or stolen content can be detected in that time frame. Possibly the payout accumulated by these bad actors could also be chained to the original(s) poster(s) thread or challenged during the time period. Additionally to ponder, would we allow multiple, original thinkers, presenting a different unique perspective from an event or experience for example?
RE: Why issue #177 will attrack more fake, fraudulent accounts then ever before, and it might kill Steemit.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why issue #177 will attrack more fake, fraudulent accounts then ever before, and it might kill Steemit.
Sure! We're only talking about obvious stolen or duplicated content, or claimed stories that are verified not to belong to the author, like faking cancer and stuff.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Got it.
What will become of blatant misleading titles and posts built to snare new users to grow their network? I see plenty of them and it looks like fraud and schemes. Would you want us to flag and also comment why we think the content/post deserves to be removed or just flag it?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit