IMO, the psychological satisfaction sometimes weight much more to a curator than any financial rewards.
I agree. I am just playing devil's advocate. You can find that I already suggested this argument last month and got a huge backlash.
financially speaking, the 3% difference is just too small to justified the time and effort invested.
But there's no significant efforts and time if one is using bots.
Exactly.... that's the main reason why curation reward should be removed.
curator who don't use bot will probably get much less than 1%, so the curation reward is actually penalizing those who perform good curation manually.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit