I have been following the various efforts to gain promotion for the Steem Blockchain. The most recent efforts were by @timcliff (number 2 witness), where he crowed sourced ideas for memes to attract new investment. There have also seen efforts by @stephenkendal to market steem to the masses.
Who has the deepest pockets?
The world of finance is so much larger than the blockchain market caps most people are aware of, in the world of finance, trillion dollar balance sheets exist. To put that into prospective, there are companies that have balance sheets with assets that are 10 times greater than the whole cryptocurrency market space.
A recent list of financial institutions with over $trillion in assets under management. Some were clients that I helped to audit/advise while working at KPMG from 2006 to 2011
Rank Asset / Fund Management Country AUM (USD)
1 Blackrock Investment Management United States $5.4 Trillion
2 Vanguard United States $4.2 Trillion
3 State Street Global Advisors United States $2.56 Trillion
4 Fidelity Investments United States $2.2 Trillion
5 JP Morgan Asset Management United States $1.8 Trillion
6 BNY Mellon Investment Management United States $1.7 Trillion
7 PIMCO Investment Management United States $1.5 Trillion
8 Amundi Asset Management France $1.4 Trillion
9 Capital Group United States $1.4 Trillion
10 Prudential Financial United States $1.2 Trillion
11 Legal & General United Kingdom $1.1 Trillion
12 Wellington Management United States $1 Trillion
13 Northern Trust United States $1 Trillion
Blockchain awareness amongst legacy finance institutions
The leaders of the legacy financial system are slowly becoming more aware of the world of blockchain and cryptocurrency, so how do we as steem blockchain users communicate and interact with these legacy players?
There are a few sources of news that finance professionals read religiously, the ones I am aware of are The Economist, The Financial Times, Bloomberg and Reuters.
When one of them mentions your project in an article, it's a great opportunity to respond and engage.
So when The Economist made the following comment about the steem blockchain:
"The most elaborate working crypto-economic model, however, is Steemit, an online forum which rewards its 1m or so registered users for posting contributions or rating content with real money in the form of steem, another sort of token. One type is liquid and can be cashed out using an exchange, which is meant to provide near-instant gratification and attract users. The other, called “steem power”, is less easily convertible and supposed to keep members engaged: the more they own, the more weight their votes have." - The Economist, June 30th, 2018
Link to article here: https://www.economist.com/special-report/2018/06/30/blockchain-technology-may-offer-a-way-to-re-decentralise-the-internet
What we should do to capitalise on this opportunity
I would encourage all of our top 20 witnesses, who in essence are the elected representatives that we vote on to respond to this article in a letter which The Economist could then publish as our response.
@gtg, @timcliff, @jesta, @roelandp, @good-karma, @blocktrades, @ausbitbank, @aggroed, @smooth.witness, @someguy123, @followbtcnews, @clayop, @lukestokes.mhth, @curie, @thecryptodrive, @anyx, @xeldal, @pfunk, @cervantes, and @drakos
I am not sure what your writing skills are like, but I have prepared an intial draft which you can use or change as you see fit.
you got my vote. I think all 100 should vote this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thanks @banditqueen
The ones below the top 20 may be more responsive, but it means more coming from the top 20. So far I have had zero response from any of the witnesses...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @kabir88!
Your post was mentioned in the Steemit Hit Parade for newcomers in the following categories:
I also upvoted your post to increase its reward
If you like my work to promote newcomers and give them more visibility on Steemit, consider to vote for my witness!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I definitely agree that the witnesses should approach 'The Economist'. The fact that Steem (Steemit) has already been mentioned is a great start but the top witnesses should be proactive and follow up.
The marketing, in general, regarding Steem has been quite bad. I see a lot of promotion angled towards encouraging people to come and produce content but very little towards explaining the benefits of investing in the platform. Getting featured in 'The Economist' would greatly help.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's the sort of think that any organisation which gets featured would do. Normally it would be a response from a member of the board of a company. But in our case, we have witnesses. I am not sure many realise that their role is to do more than just run a competent server for the blockchain
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @kabir88!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation! Your UA account score is currently 3.009 which ranks you at #9893 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has dropped 1431 places in the last three days (Your UA has decreased by 0.000).
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 204 contributions, your post is ranked at #17.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit