Automation happens after a human have seen a source of consistency in quality.
But thats not really the automation Kevin talks about. If you have moderators adjusting the system then youre really just improved on the current system of "automated choice curation."
I agree that things should get more automated, but a individual choice needs to continue to exist. You cant base everything on an algorithm across the board and hope for a consensus on value prior to content creation.
What i think youre proposing is a more efficient and advanced "steem-voter" type use... The proposal as i understood it from Kevin is based on creating an algo to determine whats value, quality, etc... That wont work imo.
Future Technology will be exponentially better so eventually that will probably work too, but I get what you are saying
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm open minded to see various systems be tested out. I may also be wrong for sure. But I think a big beauty of humans is to be able to trust them and love them. And I seen that it can work amazing. I think humans are geniuses when they come together and empower each other
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for your input, always a joy to take in
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit