If you could prove that freedom was/is part of Steemit then I would argue for it to be included. But as you say, you can't prove this, so I doubt many/any witnesses are going to take action on the basis of nothing but speculation.
RE: Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated
Yes, exactly. We can speculate all we want, but no actions were taken on accounts that were not proven to be Steemit Inc. accounts. Simply having large stake is not the issue here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It can't be proven either way, but from the way the ninjamine occurred, I would lean towards freedom at least being an insider. That's just an opinion without proof though, and I'm not advocating any stake, ninjamined or not, get curbed or removed. This breaks the DPoS.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit