That means that any junk that qualifies with the minimum amount of words can be upvoted by you indirectly
That's exactly my point. If you get the curation incentives wrong you get shit content. I have no incentive to curate properly which is why my voting power is used to upvote shit content.
Appreciate the reply. We have completely different values and it appears that you're sticking to your guns. Nothing more I can say, but thanks for being honest and handling your responses well.
To each their own, but perhaps you may reflect on whether it'll ever be worth putting people first with a certain percentage of your means. It doesn't have to all be the bottom line of an income statement to be the most valuable if you see that we're all people, not profit centers.
Your post was a great learning experience for me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit