Thanks for the info! I will check it now with your account.
Some details on the calculation:
- 1 x 100% on not voted account = 100
- 5 x 1% on not voted account = 5
- = 105
(+)
- 1 x 100% self-vote
(=) 5
Some more calculations to make the value smaller follow afterwards and for already voted accounts there is also some extra logic... (may change a bit in the coming days) The number of votes itself is only taken into account for detecting inactivity and I'm only working with sums based on the votes weight but I will see if I can find something that I may have overseen.
Hmm, this makes a lot of sense to me and I should not have observed what I had. Perhaps the rise was due to the relatively low proportion of self votes I had? I rarely vote my self unless I post something, or I am purposefully trying to piss someone off :D (which I did today, bringing that percentage up quite a bit).
Not sure, I just found this metric to be pretty interesting and potentially very useful, and wanted to ensure it gets thoroughly vetted.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, it's really a simple but still awesome algorithm :) Maybe the self-vote had really a big impact and brought your value back to 24. That would mean by not self-voting your CSI would be one of the highest I have seen so far.
Even if I won't find anything... I'm always thankful for such responses as you did because it can help a lot when more than just one person have looked into it. If I should find anything I will tell you ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sounds good, I am hopeful that this metric will be useful for me in the future when researching users. Could make a difference when curating and deciding whether to really push for a user or not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit