Math of Steem: Can I characterize the premium value I place on my outgoing vote?

in steem •  7 years ago 

So an interesting conversation with @eonwarped on Friday's Post sparked a thought: can I figure out from my voting behavior how much precisely I value an outgoing vote? What is playing the Core Game of creating and discovering content worth to me over the pure value of self-voting? (To be clear, this is the current actual self-vote value unadjusted for curation or timing. It's the return I would get if I voted my own comments and no one else did.)

Like most of us here I self-vote from time to time and vote my own interest from time to time. Most of my votes go out to other people but enough of them go to me that I should be able to figure out what premium over pure self-voting I feel is worth giving that vote to myself rather than others. In particular this is a good week for that because with delegations changing I've started spending some of my votes on upvoting @steembasicincome in order to get bonuses for their upvotes on my posts. If I wasn't doing that two weeks ago when my effective VP was 2200, and I was doing it last week when my effective SP was 1800, that sets a pretty narrow window for where my value on voting for self vs. voting for others lies.

The way SBI currently works is that a consistent 100% upvote to their daily posts doubles your effective shares and effectively doubles your weekly payout. Conveniently all of this comes in units of votes so we don't have to overcomplicate things just yet. Last week my vote was worth $0.28, and my base weekly SBI vote was worth $2.436. So I would be giving out $1.96 in votes in order to get $2.436 in votes back. SBI votes at 19 minutes and I vote later so curation should more or less balance out.

This gives us a premium of about 12.3% for our upper bound. When I was at 2200 SP my vote was worth about $0.35, so I would have been giving out $2.45 in votes for $2.436 back, which essentially gives us zero as our lower bound. At that time a vote for SBI would have been worth basically as much as a self-vote on a comment.

That's a pretty big range. Can we learn anything from where else I vote for self-benefit? Minute-zero self-voting on my posts is worth much more than a 12.3% premium, so that's not helpful. What about @qurator? They also return vote value for voting on their posts. I've been voting them $0.42 per week in order to get a vote back that varies with Steem price, which makes valuing it a bit more difficult, but even with the price low last week I got about $1.80 in additional votes for that, which is also obviously a much higher premium.

I spent some votes on @socialwallet but I have no idea how to quantify that and those were particularly at moments where I needed to vote on something before I went to sleep and didn't have other good options. Those votes did not make me happy, and I'm trying to do better at avoiding having high VP at those times.

So basically we're stuck with that 0-12.3% range, just for this account. I think it makes sense to double that for the 2000 SP I'm delegating to accounts that are primarily for outgoing votes, @asapers and @doctorworm. I get nothing but goodwill for the ASAPers delegation and Dr. Worm is all about the outgoing votes - it doesn't even earn curation when its autovotes work. (My other delegations have external reasons for not counting them. One was a mistake but I'm fulfilling the contract I agreed to, which expires next week. The other two are to accounts I use to do experiments in figuring out how these things work, obviously worth a lot to me.)

That puts us at 0% to 25%. Which isn't super-helpful. I can't necessarily get there from "at what point do I stop upvoting SBI?" because I'm not sure I can answer that to my satisfaction. (And my shares are increasing anyway.) It's convenient to have behavior to look at and not have to rely on self-awareness.

We can confirm the results of my self-assessment, however: I do put a premium of some sort on giving outgoing votes. It could theoretically be zero but that's unlikely, and it can't be lower or I would have been voting SBI all along.

We can also say that my premium is not more than 25%, or at least that if it is I've been voting SBI in error. My feeling is that it's pretty marginal, but I'm extremely biased by the fact that I'm this far into writing a post about it.

I'm going to pay attention to this and see if I can refine it by my response to other opportunities to use my vote in selfish fashion. If I can figure out a way to set up an experiment to determine the number more precisely I will, but it's hard to build an experiment to fairly judge the motivations of the person building it.

How about you? Does anyone else want to figure out what their own premium rate is? Those who never self-vote aren't going to be able to get good numbers, but if you vote selfishly some of the time you have the opportunity to figure out just how compelling the Core Game is to you. Which is probably one of the most important things to know about yourself on Steemit.

Steem.png

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Hey there, I just wanted to say thanks from the @asapers, you also reminded me that I had not yet set you up on Steem Auto as we do try to reward our delegators for sharing the love and helping us pay it forward. Thanks again I really appreciate it as do the people we curate and help find their feet in the complex world that is Steemit.

Oh great, now I have to redo all the math. :-)

haha oh no, sorry about that. The price we pay for paying it forward. lol. :)

Love the perspective. If I understand correctly, it is similar to trying to determine the cost of true curation against best ROI. The premium then is the avg percent amount you give up to upvote something not ROI based. Considering the variable nature, this particular question does come down to psychology as you've said, as curation rewards are there to essentially offset the mental predicament.

You can always get more with calculated efforts, so then the difference between time spent curating and ROIing correlated with that premium could be said to be what, a core game care score lol, I don't know where I was trying to go with anything, but cool read.

lol, I don't know where I was trying to go with anything

The core emotion of analyzing Steem.

If I understand correctly, it is similar to trying to determine the cost of true curation against best ROI.

It's sort of the reverse of that. It's trying to quantify how much my personal enjoyment of true curation is worth to me. (Or curation plus community-building if you want to separate them.)

I've made a lot of money bonus whoring on the internet for the last fifteen years. I would have no problem heartlessly maximizing ROI if that was what I wanted; I know because I've done it many times before. But this other stuff is fun, and there's a lot less of that around than money.

if you are looking for the highest ROI it might not be something that "public" initiatives will deliver to you. Now, I'm not advocating for you to join voting cabals, but truth be told they are the most profitable way of exchanging votes, ethics aside.

You say you can double the number and I'm actually seeing 12% avg as much more than I ever expected. I guess its all perspectives.

Well it's probably somewhere in the middle of the 0-25% range anyway.

I'm not sure this is really a decent way to think about ROI, as there's a lot it doesn't account for in that sense. It's more about psychology.

Now, I'm not advocating for you to join voting cabals, but truth be told they are the most profitable way of exchanging votes, ethics aside.

Fundamentally a cabal can only get you as much as a self-vote. You're just trading your vote for someone else's of the same size, and the result is the same. There are lots of better deals out there.

if i understood correctly, you are talking about the tension between cynicism and earnestness, assuming that the two types of vote strategy can be said to mean these things... i think it's a profound question. i think the two are always in irreconcileable compromise

I don't think so? I don't know, that's kind of at left angles with the way I think about it and I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around it. It feels perfectly, thoroughly earnest to me to trade $1 for $1.50.

I might characterize it as the tension between optimism and practicality. Optimism must on some level be practical, and practicality without optimism is misery.

Really cool update, thanks for sharing, I enjoyed reading and I'm going to practicalize that.

As a follower of @followforupvotes this post has been randomly selected and upvoted! Enjoy your upvote and have a great day!

th.jpg

Liz-lemon-eye-roll.gif