It's more than selectively picking the biggest one. They've selectively chosen to ignore the ninja-mined stake that is already doing what they're afraid of in favor of blocking one that isn't, while doing things that way accrues financial benefit to themselves.
RE: Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated
Freedom is not Steemit Inc, regardless how much you might despise his activities. Also, nobody is just censoring an account based on speculations. All the accounts that were part of SF 0.22.2, are 100% Steemit Inc accounts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"As far as we know". If anyone can prove that freedom is in fact Steemit or Ned or Dan or such, then please bring it forward.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
To be fair, their argument is (as I understand it) the steemit inc stake has been bound by a contract with the community, so this is to enforce that contract.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit