RE: Haejin Update - Just Under 4%, $4.68Mill a Year

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Haejin Update - Just Under 4%, $4.68Mill a Year

in steem •  7 years ago  (edited)

Lol they have all the right to do so..... That's how steemit was built.... Otherwise you won't have been able to have above a certain amount of steem... Because of that, and if I had a million bucs... It's very well my own damn business and my own damn choice where I would spend it... And besides I would have done the same if all the other big whales downvoted me.... Now matter how you play your cards.... Goodluck going against him.... Because the way it looks to me is all you suckers are losing xD xD xD hahaha lols!!!!.... And BTW I'm not going to read that whole paragraph which you wrote.... So Thnx for chipping into the conversation =).... And by the g@d d@mn way..... Go check all the positive comments on his posts, then you have the audacity to say that he doesn't have people voting on him... But that the majority are downvoting him... Oh please brother...

And besides any other points made that might be true or false....

WHY HAVENTT THE STEEMIT DEVELOPERS PUT A STOP TO IT, OR ATLEAST DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE "PROBLEM"..... BECAUSE IT'S ALLOWED.....

????????

THAT'S LIKE ME BUYING A SUPERCOMPUTER AND HAVING 90% OF THE HASH RATES ON THE BITCOIN BLOCKCHAIN... HENCEFORTH GETTING 90% OF ALL BITCOINS MINED.... WOULD YOU GUYS ALSO PUT UP A FUZZ??????

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

For once, I really thought you had a genuine opinion.

But it is.... It's genuinely my opinion

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

The difference is that in mining bitcoin, you are a producer. When you accept rewards from Steem, you are a consumer. The rewards were produced long before you, I or haejin ever got here and if we left they would remain the same.

We all have a responsibility in deciding how those rewards are consumed. It is perfectly ok to downvote based on reward value. That is built into the design of steem to stop this exact scenario.

Jesus who are you

If one pool controlled about nore than 50% of the hashing power in bitcoin it would go though a huge hardfork or dox/petition tge perosn to give up the pool look what happened ghash.io

I see thnx

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

Lol and you have all the say? Ask yourself this if you had so much steem power... Wouldn't you also upvote yourself and put out 10 posts a day?... And if that answer is no, then well my friend you are not human... Because everyone wants to make money, and if I or any other person had that ability to do so, we would without second thought..... But obviously ignorance is bliss

And you are correct I have not gone into any research, I'm just stating my point of view from what I see is happening.... Because even if haejin's stops his self upvoting and ranco..... Everyone against him will still continue to downvote him, and then how should he fair against the other whales, if you understand what I'm trying to say....

I do fully understand your point of view and that all the facts are there, but dude come on haejin didn't start this?

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

cool Thnx bud... Only 1 thing remains standing, Heajin is going to win and you guys are all wasting your time xD... because whats happening now is definatly going to stay the same....

1 more thing... stop thinking that you are smarter than the next person... You dont know what I do for a living or what I contribute to society or to myself. But if you really want to be a douchebag about it, be my guest.. it just proves who you are as a person.

But as for me, I will continue taking Haejin's advice seeing that my portfolio has only grew since that day.

Thank You @biasnarrative. The best of luck to you and your family.

AND KEEP HODLING

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

ah shit dude i see whats happening though

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment