It's foolishness to add numbers together based on their position in the Hebrew alphabet and pretend that it means something.
It's also a bit ridiculous to use a 1769 translation of the Bible. As if they did the best job using the oldest and most reliable manuscripts.
Yes, Jesus wasn't born on December 25th. It's extremely unlikely that people would have been forced to travel during the winter for the Roman census.
That 1769 version is still better than the Never Inspired Version you always quote from.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit