RE: [Proposal] Decoupling Curation Rewards from Post's

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

[Proposal] Decoupling Curation Rewards from Post's

in steemit •  8 years ago 

The idea is people who worked should get paid. The hard part is how to evaluate their work. If the rule encourages people to vote randomly, they will. If there are numbers, bots will play with them.

steemit
8 years ago by

Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

  • Disagreement on rewards
  • Fraud or plagiarism
  • Hate speech or trolling
  • Miscategorized content or spam

Submit
$0.00
    2
    Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
    If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
    Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  8 years ago 

    I wonder is it technically possible to mask the votes amount with some cryptogrphy until the end of voting round?

    Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

    • Disagreement on rewards
    • Fraud or plagiarism
    • Hate speech or trolling
    • Miscategorized content or spam

    Submit
    $0.00
      [-]
        ·  8 years ago 

      I guess it's possible.. But I'm not an expert on this topic.

      By the way, after we implemented FABRIC, votes can be done on a sub-chain which is not open to public, so perhaps at that time we can hide things that need to be hidden.

      Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

      • Disagreement on rewards
      • Fraud or plagiarism
      • Hate speech or trolling
      • Miscategorized content or spam

      Submit
      $0.00