SIP - 'Images were hidden due to low ratings.' - Should include videos?

anduweb (61) in steemit • 8 years ago

Shouldn't the content hidden include videos too?

Post used just as an example: https://steemit.com/life/@pjo/hearing-colors

PS. I'm just approaching the functionality and how it could/should work, not touching the entire censoring of the matter.

steemit steemitwebsite sip

8 years ago by anduweb (61)

$0.00

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!

Sort Order:

Trending

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago

censorship of anyone is wrong. flagging should not be an option imo. fuck the flaggots!

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

anduweb (61) · 8 years ago

censorship is not the subject of my post and it shouldn't spark a discussion over it.

$0.00

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago

if the fact that getting flagged doesn't hide videos but only picts , how does that NOT fall under censorship when the only use of flagging is to censor someone? O.o

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

anduweb (61) · 8 years ago

I am approaching the functionality of the feature not the reasoning behind it.

$0.00

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago

so by pointing out that videos of people that are flagged aren't censored your not promoting making vieos censored how?
looks to me like by bringing up the point that voideos have not ven censored when flagged yet is only pointing it out to try to get it so they don't show up when flagged.
can you please elobrate on how your post is not supporting and pushing the idea of censoring videos of people if they are flagged?
O.o
Fucking swear

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

anduweb (61) · 8 years ago

man, cool off. I'm not continuing the debate over censorship and I'm not repeating myself.

$0.00

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago (edited)

the "functionality of the feature" would not come up if you did not want to censor the video posted.
:/

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago

no need to repete yourself, all our words are in the block chain for ever.
so keep pushing the idea that videos need to be censored too when someone get flagged at the same time trying to say it has nothing to do with censorship.
lol
good luck with pushing censorship whie saying your not.
-smh-
fucking swear people forgot how to take responsibilities for ther own actions

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

anduweb (61) · 8 years ago

You removed the comment from the below thread. I was just answering you there:

Thanks for the U&F and while I am against censorship, it's a different approach here. Did you check the post used as an example? It's not hidden due to being censorship but plagiarism. Ttly different.

$0.00

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago

ugh so quick to talk shit and ad hominem.
I never said anything about the post you took the pict from I was talking about your post.
number 4 you say hidden content is not censorship but it is. you then say you strongly believe it should have been flagged to hell. I do not give a shit about your reasoning behind why you want to flag something but when you do flag something you are trying to censor something.
I agree plagurisim is wrong but so is censorship. I do not support either of them.
I was drunk as shit last night but everything I said stands. yes I did delete a reply I made about following you and upvoting because after I hit send I realized the person I just said that to was also the person that made the post about helping cencor people.
So I deleted it.
the fact that you made the reply a quote is what messed with me. I thought you were trying to quote me with something I didn't even say.
have a great day and steem on.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago (edited)

I removed the comment because I didn't see it was you saying you not supporting your own post. the quote you paste was not from me and I have no clue where you got it from.
it don't even look how I write.
so maby take you plagerisim shit to the person it belongs to.
my comment about censorship stands. it is wrong to censor people

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

anduweb (61) · 8 years ago (edited)

the quote was what I wrote in a reply to the comment you deleted. You clearly need to read things better before commenting and it's valid for everything you've said on this post so far.

$0.00

[-]

skeptic (57) · 8 years ago

no, more lies and people can look into the block chain to see the truth I don't even understand what half that quote you posted means.
the comment I posted that I removedsaid I was following you and upvoted your comment because in you comment you said you did not support your own post after a bunch of "hahahaha". then I realized your the person who wront the post so I deleted it.
you write the post then say you don't support the post in the comment? yeah I deleted the comment I made about following you, removed the upvote I gave you and am now laughing that your posting a quote someone else made to you about some a&e bullshit.
LOl move on with your crap. you have done nothing but lie after making a post about how to better censor people.
fuck off with your noise, im out!

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

anduweb (61) · 8 years ago

Look @skeptic, you obviously have a focus and comprehension problem so let me put this in clear notes for you and for the last time, as I won't waste anymore time responding to your comments:

Any dev would want to know that the purpose of their implementation addresses the entire issue not just part of it. I made this post to mention they may have overlooked the video aspect when hiding a post's images.
I used a post as example and the screenshot is from that post. That's what I understand @alex2016 was commenting on as a good video since that post has a video in it. That post I'm not promoting but just using it as an example.
You commented then deleted your comment. Since I couldn't answer you on the deleted comment I answered it above and used the > quote to tell you what I wanted to say.
The post I used as an example of hidden content is not censorship. The author is plagiarizing and looking for rewards for somebody else's work. I strongly believe it should have been flagged to hell for that.

$0.00

[-]

alex2016 (62) · 8 years ago

Good video!

$0.00

[-]

anduweb (61) · 8 years ago

hahaha, i'm not promoting the post, it's just used as an example of the downvoted hiding content thing.

$0.00