So, in the aftermath of #SPUD2 and my power up, newbie me kept on reading, and rolled across these two truly rattling articles:
Where are the VOICES of STEEM?!
MEOS ... June 1st ... The STEEM/Steemit Killer
I then was further intrigued to find this article: I'm not worried, which both subtracted and added concerns.
As a newbie to cryptocurrency and to Steem and to Steemit, I'm not equipped to understand all the ins and outs and data presented in those three articles. I can't have my head in the sand because I don't even know where the sand is, and my investment is not yet that huge for me to be overly worried. By temperament, I am always inclined to stay the course, and my sister always says I'd be the last one off a sinking ship because the minute I found out it was sinking, I would be trying to help others off instead of rushing to a lifeboat. So that's that.
But I offer to the general Steemian public why I have stayed around this long, why what I learned about "SID" -- Steemit Induced Depression -- did not make of me another victim who left the platform scarcely after joining. I offer this because I have gathered through research and commentary since my beginning here that retention is a problem, and perhaps hearing it from a newbie's perspective will offer some ideas that more advanced Steemians can use to solve problems.
I'm still here because you gave me a tangible welcome, dear Steemians.
I'm here because @carlgnash gave me a big enough delegation for me to operate in a rational way until I learned how to use my RC and voting credits appropriately. I never had to get as frustrated as others must within the limits of where we all start.
I'm here also because @c-squared and @classical-music recognized the value of my work early, along with many other Steemians, and so I never had to deal with the forbidding wall of $0.00 on article after article after article.
I'm here because Steemians pointed me to @pifc, @steembasicincome, @team-ccc, @curie, @qurator, @oleg326756, and many, many other communities and people who helped me.
I'm here because somebody showed me how to use Steem Board and Steem Now, and so I can track my progress periodically and see that indeed, things are looking up.
I'm here because the Steemians I have met and encountered are passionate creatives who want to build individually and collectively.
I'm here because all of the above confirms my belief as a Christian that my Lord led me here, and I'm here until He says otherwise.
With all that, I still took a week off to deal with Steemit Induced Depression in May. I got depressed like many others, and consider: I am a 13-year small business owner with two published books and a background in journalism. So, I already am capable of massive production on deadline. With all that, the low payouts at first were just depressing, even though I know it takes a long time to build something from scratch and be profitable.
Imagine what it is like for newbies who don't have such a background.
Imagine what would have happened even to me if all of you hadn't welcomed me, and given me heavy support.
Okay, okay -- "But you're a decent writer and musician, Deeann, you produce and you add value to the Steem blockchain and Steemit on a regular basis" -- granted. I do my best over here with my piano improvs and other music (need to get back to that, but May was rough, as you'll see below) and my writing. Yet without the heavy support, I wouldn't have stayed here long enough to show what I can do.
I also have something else going for me that you won't find as often in looking for mass adopters of Steem and Steemit: a measure of emotional discipline, including a tolerance for pain. With all the support, getting to here has been painful... you put your heart into something creative and you get a few views and fewer cents ... that hurts, a lot. Not everybody can endure that, again and again. We are living in a time when the walking wounded are legion.
Also, consider this when you consider people like me trying to onboard other people: nowadays I can't always get people to work together for $22,500 or so USD, much less for cents at a time in cryptocurrency. That was a lesson in heartbreak for me in May. Because of the way things are in many levels of society, people are less and less willing or able, time-wise, resource-wise, and emotionally, to invest in a complex process with a lot of work unless the payoff to them is sure and quickly coming.
I say again: in May I could not get folks to move for a chance at $22,500USD to spread around. $10,000 of that chance is gone for at least five years. $7,500 of that chance is likely gone forever. $7,500 I have reached out to seize alone... just like I quietly work, alone, in the wee hours on Steemit, after everything else is done, seizing this chance, alone.
I also say again: although I am self-motivated and skilled for such an opportunity as Steemit, I would never have seen the opportunity enough to invest in it without the heavy support you wonderful Steemians gave me to get far enough to see what was possible.
So, what can we all do to help Steemit grow?
Form a Steemian Welcoming Committee, or something like that, so when people get here with whatever gifts and talents they bring to the table, they stay long enough to find out this is the right place. There is absolutely no point in trying to get more and more people in the front door if they are going to go right out through the back. I can't even in good conscience invite a whole bunch of mass adopters that I can't delegate enough to in order to get them off to a good start -- they will blow through the back door in a heartbeat.
Yet with a welcoming committee, we can remove the constant bumping into messages about RC limits, and the forbidding walls of $0.00 payouts -- we can delegate enough so newbies can at least get a good footing, and point them to the right resources to help them pick up quickly what they need to do to make this work. Yes, they are going to have to put work in, and lots of it, before the rewards are big.
Yet as it is, some of the best people who could be using Steem and Steemit go somewhere else because they CAN. I can. My habits assure me success just about anywhere. But I stay here because you all showed me you wanted me here, strong enough and long enough for me to figure out that I could make this work in a lot of ways. Within the vast pools of mass adopters, there are plenty of people who will rise to the occasion of being valuable and productive if we can show we want them here, on Steemit, and we do it better than ANY of our future competitors.
I'm just a newbie. Take everything I have said here with a grain of she-just-got-here-and-still-knows-practically-nothing salt. I am aware from reading the first two of the three articles I referenced that there are systemic issues that need to be addressed with Steem and Steemit. But those are FAR above my newbie pay grade -- I've only been a minnow through delegation for a week, after only three months here. I can only offer what it looks like from someone who started in March as plankton, plankton that was loved up into a minnow quickly by all of you, and who therefore wants all of us to succeed with this.
I want us to make it, Steemians, and I want us to be able to bring to Steemit all those who should be here with us, and have them be glad to stay. I offer these thoughts in that spirit, and in that hope.
Photo Credit: Kristopher Roller on Unsplash
Very insightful as usual @deeanndmathews. I agree that a welcoming committee would go a long way. There are many other informal welcoming avenues, but newbies like us need to seek them out, like posting in Introduceyourself, checking out things on discord, posting comments, and just interacting with the Steemit posts in general.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
See, what you just said needs to be part of the welcoming committee's first post -- if only most knew to
The only step I got right was the first one, and I was blessed to have the kind of writing skills to make my mark then. Equally valuable people are missing step 1 because they don't know to do it. I figured out Discord just last week. Steps 3 and 4 I didn't have to endure as harshly because I got those early delegations. Only now is it all making sense.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi deeanndmathews, as one Newbie to another I share some of the same thoughts and concerns as you. I am really glad to see your post on this. I think the community needs more post like this from newbies.
Like you I got a great welcome to steemit, several great newbie’s mentions and some good upvotes to get started (I really thank the steemit community for that). But it didn’t take long to realize that I needed some steem power to really be an active part of the community. My approach has been to purchase SP a little at a time. I also attempt to encourage other new steemians to purchase SP if they can. If new steemians promote steem it will grow faster, glad to see your effort.
Again I share your concerns about new steemians, to include ourselves and the welfare of all steemians on steemit and other Dapp.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your approach is an excellent one -- it's an option more newbies need to know is available to them! There is SO MUCH Steemit already has to offer to help newbies like us, but right now what I see is that if someone doesn't meet us newbies at the gate with next steps, newbies get lost at the gate, not knowing the best paths through this largely unknown territory.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@deeanndmathews,
A very thoughtful and well-written piece. The blockchain is fortunate to have you.
Steemians are caught in a conundrum: STEEM/Steemit is a brilliant idea IN THEORY ... but a rat hole in REALITY.
To make the latter reflect the former, we're going to need to enact some reforms. We're going to have to elevate MERIT over MANIPULATION. While this sounds like a mere matter of common sense, there are people benefiting from the status quo and many of those people have the largest stakes, and therefore the largest votes.
Technology changes, people don't.
Later in the day, I will be publishing a follow-on article respecting the MEOS ("Voice") launch (I wasn't impressed). We have, in my estimation, just received a temporary reprieve. I hope we are wise enough to use it to fix what is broken.
Quill
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I will read your next article shortly, and I am glad to know about the reprieve.
I must say that your article, and comment, provided much of the cognitive dissonance that generated this post. I have never experienced the rat hole; I have experienced the theory. Nevertheless, I will not, as a newbie with a knowledge of the unfortunate persistence of the worst parts of human nature, dispute your assessment. I respect the history and the knowledge that you have, upon which you based your predicates and conclusions, and I respect the fact that you are about to write a post about how reality may actually differ from your conclusions in your previous article. Many people would not do that.
That said, I hope you can respect that you may inadvertently be contributing to the result you don't want -- a more skittish newbie might have read your headline, panicked, and RUN from the platform. In essence, you would have helped to trigger the bank run -- not EOS and MEOS, but that headline alone. Self-preservation is as strong as greed. If the percentages you mention are correct, and it would only take the departure of 10 percent of Steemians to sink the whole endeavor, I would think you might not want to terrify us newbies, because at least 10 percent of Steemians at any one time are newbies.
EDIT: I have now read your new article "Voice" (MEOS) Announcement ... Much Ado About Nothing, and I have a better understanding of where you were coming from in the first one. I respect your honesty, and the motivation you and @jaynie have both given those of us who are interested in being here to look around and see what we can make better.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post was shared in the Curation Collective Discord community for curators, and upvoted and resteemed by the @c-squared community account after manual review.
@c-squared runs a community witness. Please consider using one of your witness votes on us here
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am happy you are sticking around :) I will say that I personally think the current (and past) marketing approach to sell Steem as a place to earn $ by posting content is misguided at best and harmful at worst. People join expecting to earn, and leave when they find out how the actual economics work. Unless some Korean crypto whales decide to randomly pump SBD again (this was before your time so you may not know what I am talking about, but for a brief glorious moment at the end of 2017 and beginning of 2018 some Korean traders pumped SBD up to ridiculous levels, which made posting here actually profitable) only a tiny tiny fraction of the users here have a chance of actually earning anything decent.
It seems to me that everyone is missing the actual value of Steem. A social media website where you see the content of people you follow, because you followed them. Where corporate censorship is almost non-existent (almost, because illegal content can and is still taken down from individual front ends). Today more than ever, these should be huge selling points but nobody seems to be taking advantage of this. Seriously, I wish everybody would quit trying to onboard people by telling them they can earn $. Start onboarding people by telling them they can take back control over their own social media experience in a land where algorithms designed to spread divisive and fear-mongering content do not serve you up content. That is the (obvious, to me) value proposition of Steem. As long as people are onboarding expecting to earn, and looking at earning as the primary reason they are here, the retention rate will be abysmal.
BTW there are several welcoming committee style projects already in place. And RE the resource credits issue, once the MIRA RocksDB implemention is complete, resource credits should become much less of an issue (if you haven't been following the steemit blog posts on this subject, RocksDB is a database tool developed by (uggh) Facebook which will allow most transactions on the blockchain to be processed using ROM instead of RAM, which should exponentially lower the state cost of transacting on the blockchain and make the resource credit requirements for posting way lower).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@carlgnash, thank you AGAIN for that initial support, which got me over the early hurdles long enough to see what you see -- I love being here because we are NOT Facebook. Facebook and the rest are toxic to sustained creativity and high level discourse.
Good to know that there are several welcoming committees in place, and I agree with you that people brought in with hopes of cash will always head back out again. I agree: that latter marketing strategy is a disaster, particularly when one considers the desperation for cash many writers are in, and how short their patience is, and how quickly they can turn their disappointment into BAD press for Steem and Steemit.
So, anybody know who I need to write to about that little issue? Up from Plankton 2 still remains to be written...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There has definitely been a learning curve getting into this platform. I didn't know what I was doing when I started, probably only partially do now, and it took time and effort to find out how things worked.
I am happy I found some people, and groups, that have been helpful but some kind of "Hi, welcome, this is how things work here and what you can do to get somewhere" would be helpful for beginners, and retaining them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree with you completely, @lordvdr, and that is what I am working to bring attention to... I'm going to get some more whales' attention on this, too, as much as a newbie can... put "50 best tags" in Steemit search and see what comes up to find out how to get your work SEEN
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit