The blockchain is not free. Nothing is, by the way, but this fundamental truth is way more obvious in decentralized contexts, where participants must collaborate in an organized manner, that will allow them to use resources in a more or less meritocratic way (please note I didn't say "democratic", which is the dictatorship of majority, but "meritocratic").
This somehow precious introduction should - allegedly - spark your interest for a topic that is going to impact a lot your activity on the Steem blockchain, starting with HardFork 20.
Because, starting with HF20, the current "blockchain cost", known as bandwidth, will be replaced with a more refined model, dubbed "Resource Credits", or RC.
What follows is an attempt to translate (again) from Tech to English the most important parts of the new Resource Credits system.
What Are Resource Credits?
According to @steemitblog, which announced this new model about a month ago:
[Resource Credits are] non-transferable credits given to each account based on how much Steem Power it has, which get “spent” whenever a user transacts with the Steem blockchain.
Are Resource Credits Regenerable, Just Like Voting Power?
Yes.
Are Resource Credits Another Type Of Token On The Steem Blockchain?
Nope. RC are non-transferrable and you can only spend them when you interact with the blockchain: like posting, sending STEEM, powering up or down, voting, etc.
How Is The Price Of Resource Credits Established?
The blockchain is a complicated animal. It's made of humans (witnesses, devs), and machines (which have RAM, HDD storage, CPU cycles) which are talking to each other over a network (the Internet, sort of). Each type of resource in this mechanism will be a "resource budget pool". Meaning each type of resource will cost a certain amount of RC.
Can You Give An Example?
I will blatantly copy the example on @steetmiblog:
If CPU cycles cost 5 RC / megacycle, state memory costs 8 RC / byte, and history size costs 4 RC / byte, a transaction which takes 2 megacycles, creates 50 bytes of state, and has a 150 byte transaction size will cost 25 + 508 + 150*4 = 1010 RC.
(this was authored by one of the devs, @youkaicountry)
These Resource Credits Will Actually Go To Witness Nodes?
Nope, as far as I understand. They will be "burned" with each transaction, whereas the network supporters, like witness operators, will continue to be rewarded by current mechanisms (Steem Power).
No Steem Power, No Resource Credits?
Yup. You gotta have some stored juice to interact with the blockchain.
How Is This Better Than What We Have Now?
- it's more accurate (having multiple resource budget pools will allow for a much more granular evaluation of resources)
- it's more predictable (if RC prices for each resource will be public - and they must be - every user will know exactly how much they can interact with the blockchain at their current SP level)
- it's more flexible (each resource budget pool value can fluctuate over time, hence the price can be easier to adjust based on these variations)
When Will This Be Available?
- starting with HardFork 20, (which may land in a few months)
I'm a serial entrepreneur, blogger and ultrarunner. You can find me mainly on my blog at Dragos Roua where I write about productivity, business, relationships and running. Here on Steemit you may stay updated by following me @dragosroua.
Wanna know when you're getting paid?
|
I know the feeling. That's why I created steem.supply, an easy to use and accurate tool for calculating your Steemit rewards |
The difficult issue I'm seeing here is in how to cut down on spam and other "money for nothing" actors on here while not ending opportunity for new people from poor countries (or simply poor households) who really do want to contribute to the platform.
You can say "create good content" but you know, I think I create great content consistently, but I'm not kidding myself that my buying STEEM hasn't been the greater part of my modest success on here.
Before I was able to buy STEEM, or sufficiently convinced this was a good investment to decide to, I would not have been able to grow my base of support. I grew by commenting and upvoting. If I had been restricted too severely in how much of each I could do, I would not have been able to interact enough to gain traction here.
I get how there is a desire to make sure that those who use the resources of the blockchain be invested in the blockchain, but I think there has to be a better way of establishing that than simply how much money someone has been able to put into the platform.
And again, even though you can supposedly accumulate this SP by creating content, not buying it, with this new plan you will likely run out of RC before you even have been able to create enough content to get a leg up.
How is the platform to differentiate between spam content creation and genuine content creation by poor people? This is the core solution needed, not steps that penalize people for being new and relatively poor.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like the idea behind RCs. I'm wondering, though, if those with high SP who have nearly all of their SP in delegation will be affected by this, or if it will act similarly to how voting for witnesses work, with no ill effect whatsoever.
I have my own opinions about delegation, but if this causes those who are basically operating at 50 SP or less because the rest is delegated to have problems interacting with the blockchain, if they're inclined (and many don't), then I wonder if that will have any impact on delegation and activity on the blockchain in general.
In addition, in reading through the couple of posts talking about RCs when they came out, I don't remember how this will affect new accounts. Lately they've been receiving less SP and more delegation to start. With RCs, will they have sufficient SP to start with to get going?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What does "get a glimpse" mean though? Literally just seeing it working, like looking in a window from outside without really being able to participate? Or be able to post, comment, upvote, etc. but only about the same amount new accounts can now?
This is a vitally important point, because if you both restrict the ability of new people to participate unless they are able to buy STEEM, and simultaneously make it really obvious that different people get to participate different amounts based solely on how much money they have (SP that is not delegated to them), it could really stifle growth for the platform.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
they've been saying 'a few months' for a 'few months'
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I had that same thought when I read that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am not surprised by these changes. it is increasingly difficult to grow here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Any improvement bringing transparency to the blockchain seems a good policy. It will probably take a little while to get to understand how it works but after the initial period everyone will get a clear picture of the rules.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
HardFork 20 is so much being talked about and more is currently being expected of it.
I hope it delivers the promise. Overall it looks promising:)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Transactions use up RC?
That might be a problem for a lot of exchanges like poloniex and openledger that have very little SP and RC but have to make thousands of transactions on a daily basis.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I see a huge opportunity for decentralized exchanges here...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Still doesn't seem that clear to me. I get the general concept but seems a bit unnecessary??
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It' already working to various levels in all blockchains. Gas price in Ethereum, transaction size in Bitcoin, etc. Steem already had a model - the "bandwidth" thing - but it wasn't very transparent or efficient.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'll keep my eye on it. Hopefully it makes more sense as things progress. Just something new to learn. Thanks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So if that example costs around 1,000 resources credits, how many do you get every day? And how fast will they recharge?
What's the "price"? I thought you couldn't buy them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You don't buy them, you simply get them based on how much SP you have. The regeneration may be related to each resource budget pool, but I'm not sure yet. The moment I learn these bits, I'll post another article
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sweet! Thanks for keeping us informed. There's all so much to learn with the new system. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am pretty new and I ran into this a few days ago and knew nothing about it, Your article helped me understand what was going on. Thanks a lot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
welcome the changes, much better if it is for the good of the community.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oops....... That is, this isn't meant for people with low steem power or what........ Needs further clarification Sir. Thanks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Interesting topic ... Although very complex ... We learn on the fly and hopefully for the good of all and not just the big ones.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So basically, those who have more SP have more RC ? LOL...so much for empowering the poor, this sounds like another 'lets favour the rich' upgrade. Why don't they just simply ban poor people from Steem completely ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Or you can create good content and get SP organically through the platform, just like a lot of the top authors who had started out as 'poor' on steemit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
low quantity but quality stuff is all that you need and some patience too xD
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What nonsense. Steemit is a very different beast than it was 2 years ago when it was tiny by comparison. Search through figures for new members who joined this year and see how their rate of progress differs hugely to those who started earlier. 'Creating good content' does not earn much, it's just a buzzword. To make money on Steemit you need to invest money and upvote yourself and buy votes, simple.
As you told me there are 'top' authors who started out poor, could you give me some examples, and also start by defining 'poor' as you understand it please?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I support what @sqamemal says. I said it many times myself: Steemit is not a magic tool to make people rich. The only major improvement it does to the blogging industry is that it shortens the path to the money, by creating a token. But all the other stuff, like creating and maintaining an audience, promoting your post, being consistent, etc, still has to be done. And this was always a tedious, time consuming task. I blog for almost 10 years, and it took me 6 months since start to actually create a viral post. I started to make some money after 1-2 years. Now in Steemit you can make a few cents per article even if you are completely unknown.
There's obviously an "early adopter" advantage, but that's in every niche. I think it would be unfair to judge Steemit only through this lens.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I know it's not a magic tool to make people rich, although if you had a lot of money to start with, the model dictates that you could make a massive return, but it should be a fair society of equals, but it really isn't.
Anyway, apologies. Your informative post isn't the time or place for this discussion but I still see HF20 as favouring the whales, dolphins and witnesses financially...and hitting plankton and minnows unfairly hard......but that 'create good content' mantra really grinds.....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steemit is not fair. Nor is life.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
People say "life's not fair" as though it were the universal law of physics. There are things we can do to make it more fair. We can't dictate who gets hit by a tornado, but we can house and feed and clothe people. That society chooses not to is not a rule, it's just shitty.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's true that life is often not fair, but there are pockets of fairness humans have created. Steemit could at least strive to be one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What constitutes fair, exactly? In the context of Steemit, what is fair in your mind? Last I checked, the only barrier to entry is an internet connection. Otherwise, there is no opportunity that is barred from anyone here in any capacity. You are as free as me, or a brand new user, to engage in any of the activities that anyone else does on this blockchain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Doesn't make it right though lol ;-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Earlier the bandwidth was serious problem but you need to have some SP for more usage :) but anyways thanks for sharing it in details about the new changes that being rolled out
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
GReat job @dragosroua
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It solved my problem perfectly!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit