Normally in the real world, people would be able to formulate a coherent refutation to go along with their downvote..Instead of having the ability to wipe out the value of a post simply on the basis that they disagree with it.."You're wrong" isn't a refutation. Or is the criteria for "quality content" directly proportional to how much one particular person agrees with it?
RE: So, why is there a group on Steemit flagging down anti-vaccine content?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So, why is there a group on Steemit flagging down anti-vaccine content?