They brought a good idea from conception to market. Why should they not get paid for it?
RE: @ned & @dantheman DUMP 50,500 STEEM on Market today! WTF is going on?!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@ned & @dantheman DUMP 50,500 STEEM on Market today! WTF is going on?!
They haven't brought anything to market. Steemit has not generated any true revenue. All funds have come from speculative bagholders who are watching their "investment" get crushed by the founders dumping their founder coins.
If their company were earning money for coin buyers you might have a point, but it is taking money from coin buyers with continuous dumping and no true value coming out of it yet. These are brutal dumps, not responsible selling to cover expenses and pay reasonable salaries. These are the kind of dumps designed to create a market panic or worse insider trading where they know bad news is around the corner.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Devils advocate... The second a outside dollar bought a steem it was on the market.
And how can you say what constitutes reasonable salaries and reasonable expenses. As a business owner for every new engineer I hire I make sure I have $50k-100k cash on hand to front their costs, salary, and benefits before I begin to see the first cent of value out of them
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I read your comment in Tone Vays voice. ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Theres a difference between selling and taking a shit on the market.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And that difference in perspective is... Whether you're selling or holding?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit