RE: Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord

in steemit •  6 years ago 

Then why are you intentionally spreading FUD?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

You didn't read what I wrote. Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord from its site. I never mentioned that they are removed from the Steem blockchain.

Posted using Partiko Android

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Flagged for intentionally spreading FUD by using a misleading blockchain diagram that has nothing to do with anything.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

@inertia there are only two possibilities here:

  1. You are too stupid to not be able to see association between blockchain diagram and Steem blockchain and decentralization. And you are too stupid that you think that writing about Steemit censoring the world wide known hacker group is FUD.

  2. You are doing this on purpose because this is your task as a censor.

I like option 1.

So what does that blockchain diagram have to do with STEEMIT "censoring/deleting" their account when their account is STILL on the blockchain, the comments and votes are STILL on the block chain and saying that they're REMOVED is FUD, especially if you know the distinct difference between STEEM and SteemitINC.

He's doing it on purpose because he's "censoring" you because curation is censorship, because the front end deciding on what to show or not to from the blockchain is the equivalent of them editing the data on the chain. Because why not admit that you're mistaken, that if you knew there was a difference you didn't bother to mention that critical aspect, either because you forgotten or because you are a drama queen, instead of doubling down on this, because clearly that BLOCKCHAIN DIAGRAM implies they were removed from the blockchain, not "phrased" out by a front end script and that diagram has no relevance to them being phrased out byba front end script, and if you knew they weren't deleted you'd have mentioned or remarked or hinted at that somewhere in your post, but you didn't, you chose to deceive by misleading directly because of that diagram that has nothing to do with Steemit or what hapoened with our comments.

Posted using Partiko Android

I still like option 1.

Some people like to see the world burn.

Posted using Partiko Android

Not me, I just hate to see a bunch of assholes, who are afraid to post with their real names, gang up on a low SP holder with a bunch of nonsense. They could have left a comment saying: Hey pal, you used the wrong graphic because ....., could you change that? But no; blah, blah, ...FLAG!!

The only thing flags are good for is starting Dumpster Fires, well, Dumpster Fires started. Good luck finding all of them. Hint; at least 400 dead accounts are among my 600 followers. I'm sick of inner circle Bull Shit, you only want us to buy your Steem, but we're not welcome to play with it. No, then you enforce some unwritten rules you make up on the spot by flagging and then badgering the Dog Shit out of a fellow Steemian.

None of you; @baah, @actifit-peter, @inertia, @elgeko, and @kabir88 are regular followers of @boyanpro and yet you all show up on the same post. Don't you dare tell me it's coincidence, I checked! You all came here to have some fun, huh?

Hope y'all feel better. Tell Bernie he missed out. Edit: I guess you forgot to invite him to the party.

I couldn't write it better my self. If I would have thousands of SP I would use it to flag NSFW, spam and similar garbage. I wouldn't use it on thoughts not aligned to mine. But that's just me thinking how grownups should act.

So what if nobody follows him? This got resteemed by someone I follow. I pointed out exactly what others pointed out ONLY because he keept justifying the misleading diagram, had he any sense he would have corrected his mistake instead of digging his hole, and maybe people would have removed the flags once he changed it.

Flags are necessary for EXACTLY his behavior, because people have a right to curate bullshit and FUD as poor or no value content.

Posted using Partiko Android

No, you are having trouble to comprehend some basic things here. So let me help you by explaining this. The blockchain diagram implies how fraudulent is Steemit's behavior. That they are ruining the very nature of the blockchain by artificially changing its order. The blockchain diagram is reminder what all of this here should be about. BTW I never wrote that they removed them from the blockchain.

They haven't changed the blockchain, they aren't fraudulent, and what they've done isn't ruining "the very nature of blockchain". That's why not only doesn't the diagram not have anything to do with what happened, at all, using it to imply any of the things as far as "how fraudulent steemit's behavior" is amounts to FUD.

Posted using Partiko Android

Of course they haven't changed the blockchain, they just changed its appearance. I sincerely feel sorry for you because you are not able to understand this basic statement.

You said they "artificially changed it's order". Of course I will point out that they didn't change the blockchain. If you think I don't have the "ability" to understand the difference between a front end and a back end you'd better reserve that "pitty" for someone else. Keep evading the consequences for posting a misleading diagram or for making misleading statements about what steemit did or didn't do by making this about what my capacities are, I don't know who you think you're fooling with that but certainly ain't me.

Posted using Partiko Android

Upvoted, for intentionally spreading FOMO. :)