Of which parties are you talking? (Sorry for being ignorant maybe ...)
RE: 'Conciliation' of the reward curves? / Die 'Versöhnung' der Reward-Kurven?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
'Conciliation' of the reward curves? / Die 'Versöhnung' der Reward-Kurven?
I am not too lazy to explain, but maybe you should look up 'bitcoin' and 'trustless' and maybe 'proof of work'.
Usually blockchains like bitcoin are set up as 'trustless'.
STEEM's reward system is kind of unique, but should also be set up as trust-free as possible.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for your suggestions but to be honest, for now I am too lazy to seek for additional explanations online (I consider myself as Steemit user only, who is not full time involved in blockchain related topics - but who is able to understand mathematical topics in general). Because of being too lazy to seek now, I cannot exclude the possibility that you may have a valid point in any way. :)
However based on my (limited) knowledge and mathematical understanding I see no reason why n^2 followed by a linear equation would be more easily exploitable by abusers than n^2 alone (which is what counts in my eyes).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit