RE: LOW-LIFE DOWNVOTING MEMBERS

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

LOW-LIFE DOWNVOTING MEMBERS

in steemit •  5 years ago 

@themarkymark and @unclemantis, can you please let me know what @starworld did to deserve the downvotes and what they might be able to do to repair their rep?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Fixed!

I had no idea I downvoted! Please post link and I will rectify this!

Fixed!

Thanks!

S

Libeled buildawhale (me) and implied I am a pedophile.

Would you consider this a "crime" as well?

Waytruthlight tries to lure children into his van with candy

https://steemit.com/writing/@madalchemist/q3ff7r

Or do you only downvote accounts that mention you personally?

Loading...
  ·  5 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  5 years ago Reveal Comment
Loading...
  ·  5 years ago Reveal Comment

Oh, ok. I thought you were downvoting @starworld because they called you a name ("suggested you and buildawale were a ped0").

From my perspective that's just, "Something no one has seen, that someone claims on the Internet without proof?"

I'm just wondering if you downvote accounts for name-calling generally, or do you only downvote when someone's calling you (or your alts) names?

You can look at my downvote history and figure it out for yourself. Get some education.

I can't seem to find the tab that shows your motives.

Loading...

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Isn't name-calling considered an ad hominem attack?

Nevermind, ok, let's call it libel for the sake of argument.

What can @starworld do to slake your wroth?

I mean, if someone called you the N-word, basically name-calling, what action or time-out period (30 days of silence) do you believe would be a reasonable censure?

I agree you've clearly been wronged, but you obviously outweigh @starworld significantly, so it's not exactly a "fair fight".

I'm not even sure if they're willing to apologize or take down (or modify) the offending comment. Maybe they could settle for just calling you a "jerk" or add, IMHO right before the statement?

I realize I have no option but to appeal to your intelligence and reasonableness.

I'm not even trying to help @starworld, I'm doing it for the newbz.

freedom of speech, not freedom of consequences.

Sure, ok, so does that mean that if someone crosses some unspecified line-in-the-sand, that they're just SOL forever?

Don't you think if the situation was reversed that you'd appreciate some kind of warning like a take-down-notice or some quantifiable written rule or at least some option to "pay" for what they've done?

I have trouble believing you think "might makes right".

Thanks again for your time and consideration.

I don't go around calling people scammers and pedophiles.

Of course not.

But have you ever accidentally pissed someone off?

Crossed some line you didn't even know was there?

I know I have.