Noooo... monetary incentive is good and healthy for you.
RE: Why steemit have power to beat quora in the game of content creation?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why steemit have power to beat quora in the game of content creation?
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
monetary incentive is wrong when it is done by paid promotions to write or curate content. One pay a big player and get like or promotion on whatever crap he/she post and due to this reason after some time good players will run away from the portal.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No. The true laws are those of mathematics and compound interest. A persistant and constant focussed mathematician will take it all. It is nothing more than a game, and the rules are very fair. Many bloggers on Steemit have lost their passwords and can no longer access their accounts, deminishing the quantity of available STEEM. The winner needs to be persistant and look after his passwords. I started on Steemit with nothing, only posting. My average post value was only a few cents.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
But we're talking about the creation of quality content. What you've just described in no way translates to that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Most witnesses on Steemit are interested to see that quality content is promoted. Don't you find https://steemit.com/@heiditravels or https://steemit.com/@sweetsssj or ... good? I can name you hundreds. The glass is either half full or half empty with wine. It's a point of perspective. We need incentivised content to have good content, or else we would only have shit content (like facebook)!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sweetsssj looks like a travel blog with a lot of nice photos. Not really what I'm looking for but I'm sure some people like it.
heiditravels seems to mostly post about cryptocurrency related topics and how to earn money on steemit. This is part of a problem I'm seeing, there's a ton of pages like that already. It seems like it takes up about half my feed and it just so happens I'm not all that interested in cryptocurrency.
I'm interested in movies and ancient history and what I've found on those topics has been largely disappointing. There's certainly nothing I've encountered that comes close to the well researched and factually supported information I can find on Quora.
An excess of pages based solely on how to earn steem has the potential to create an unsustainable bubble. If the bulk of people signing up are looking to make a quick buck, indeed the people writing their take on the best way to do that will get the most followers and earn the most steem.
It's like the gold rush. You know what the best way to make money was during the gold rush? Selling mining tools. In the end the gold ran out, most miners went home empty handed and the people selling mining tools moved on to other business ventures.
A similar thing could happen here if there isn't a strong enough focus on attracting people to create a diversity of content. The fact that some of the most successful pages do nothing but talk about how to make money shouldn't be seen as something to celebrate it should be a warning sign. Inevitably most people who come here wont be able to make much and if there's nothing more to keep them around they'll stop participating. The upvotes will stop, the steem will stop flowing, the cryptocurrency itself might even lose value.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit