The problem is that the platform should rotate contents to curators. Best curators could just approve new content, to make it rotate. But that's not like this... Building an external site to fix this is like buying a car because the supercar you bought is not working... Being famous cause you're already famous, or rich, is just lame. But you know, with this kind of platforms money goes to who have it at the beginning. Earning from content is just a fable, in every kind of platform. Steemit is no exception to facebook, youtube, myspace... nothing more, but something less definitely.
RE: Steemit after the initial enthusiasm
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Steemit after the initial enthusiasm
We think in the same way. I will be building and open sourcing a "super curator" system, which allows approved curators to let the system know how much content should be awarded. It will take the average of minimum 3 super-curators' upvote percentage. Of course we will not fix everything in this capitalist system, but we can let people who have more qualifications get seen more. I like to talk with likemind people like you, if you want to get in touch with me and learn about my "soon to be announced" project which is wikipedia+urban dictionary on steem, i will be waiting you on discord: https://discord.gg/KDbmXyH
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I rarely use discord, have you got linkedin?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, sorry for late reply. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mithat-erc%C3%BCment-eser-97ab328/ .
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just added ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit