RE: Fraud: SteemIt opportunities

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Fraud: SteemIt opportunities

in steemit •  8 years ago  (edited)

I don't think, that "Autocurator" is a bad thing. If something can be done properly in an automated why... then this should be automated.

BTW, this is your second post which I like. Subscribed :)

steemit
8 years ago by

Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

  • Disagreement on rewards
  • Fraud or plagiarism
  • Hate speech or trolling
  • Miscategorized content or spam

Submit
$0.00
    4 votes
    5
    Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
    If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
    Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  8 years ago 

    On the current moment you're right that "Autocurator" isn't bad. But is it good? -- the question is open for community to resolve. The community is growing and this matter is not solved whether it is good or bad.
    I plan to dig deeper into this in my next post.

    Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

    • Disagreement on rewards
    • Fraud or plagiarism
    • Hate speech or trolling
    • Miscategorized content or spam

    Submit
    $0.00
      [-]
        ·  8 years ago (edited)

      the problem with autocurator is... that it can mislead people. If there will be 100 autocurator, which will vote up "good author", which this time posted bullshit, that will end up with situation, where specific author will be favored for old contributions.

      Maybe there should be a mechanism which punishes in long term those kind of mistakes... where lets say, 50% voters says that article is bad but you voted up anyway.

      But.... what if "up vote" would be replaced by:

      • grade (from 1 to 10)
      • additional requirement for writing a summary or a reasons why something is good according to you

      This cannot be so easily automated... and that gives the author so much more feedback.

      Maybe all options should be available: upvote, summary, detail grade - and summary will be worth more.

      Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

      • Disagreement on rewards
      • Fraud or plagiarism
      • Hate speech or trolling
      • Miscategorized content or spam

      Submit
      $0.00
        [-]
          ·  8 years ago 

        I agree. Spamers can also use payvote scheme with autocurator to post their spam messages.
        We have to think a way to do not let such things possible.
        Different upvote? Maybe

        Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

        • Disagreement on rewards
        • Fraud or plagiarism
        • Hate speech or trolling
        • Miscategorized content or spam

        Submit
        $0.00
          [-]
            ·  8 years ago 

          in fact, if every role in steemit could be automated, which i think would be very hard, it would be a good thing

          Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

          • Disagreement on rewards
          • Fraud or plagiarism
          • Hate speech or trolling
          • Miscategorized content or spam

          Submit
          $0.00
            [-]
              ·  8 years ago 

            yeah and will this automated system need new original content? I guess no

            Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

            • Disagreement on rewards
            • Fraud or plagiarism
            • Hate speech or trolling
            • Miscategorized content or spam

            Submit
            $0.00