See, you disagree with me. Now that is no reason for me to flag you, is it?
(I just won't upvote you because I think you are either wrong or have misunderstood my proposal)
RE: Flagging Etiquette and Practice
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Flagging Etiquette and Practice
Likewise, you disagree with some people's curation choices. Is that any reason to flag posts you wouldn't otherwise have flagged? What you propose is, itself, abuse.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am saying that they should post their reason for the flag in a reply. It would then become apparent to discerning readers whether they are abusing their Admin powers or not. If they post their reason then no flagging of their future posts. But their motives become more transparent and displays of envy and jealousy will probably cost them (vested) followers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As I stated on another comment on this blog, I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiment in the post. However @georgedonnellly may have one salient point; Engaging in "flag wars" in an attempt to control flag abuse, may not be the best approach. I think additional functionality is needed to handle this. See my post above.
Thanks again for bringing focus to this issue!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The concensus for appropriate flagging is going to keep changing and eventually disappear as steemit expands to the masses and telling people off becomes pointless. Here are my thoughts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha, tough crowd. I'm with you on the down voting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit