(Photographer: Me. Subject: Cindy)
In my opinion, Steemit's greatest growth challenge is the continued myopia of many of its whales. The variety of topics that are regularly upvoted here continues to be rather limited--introductions, people being vulnerable, Steemit related content, blockchain and crypto content, and spiritual/philosophical stuff. By contrast, art, poetry, photography, short stories, travel, third-party links, etc. are pretty consistently overlooked.
I've tried to figure out why this is so, and it seems to me to be primarily a result of two things--the natural interests of current whales and a justified paranoia over rewarding spam or faked posts. The material that is most consistently rewarded is either of great interest to current whales or is material that cannot easily be plagiarized, faked, or spammed. Material that isn't easily faked or spammed is often either long-winded or highly personal in nature. By contrast, photos, short stories, travel blogs and third party links are easily faked or spammed and so are often overlooked by whales in an abundance of caution.
While this aversion to potentially faked posts and spam is understandable, it does limit the platform's usefulness and appeal to broader audiences and certain types of bloggers. For instance, some of the more popular Internet bloggers--like Matt Drudge or "Instapundit" Glenn Reynolds--do little more than identify and link to very interesting third party articles, photos and stories--perhaps writing a short but witty and insightful headline or comment as an introduction to them. Drudge is probably the world's greatest headline writer!
Bloggers like Matt Drudge and Glenn Reynolds have huge audiences. They provide a valuable service by essentially curating the Internet for us and by providing insightful but often very short commentary on the items they find. And yet, were they to launch their blog for the first time on Steemit today, their value would mostly be overlooked.
I want Steemit to be the Internet home of the next Matt Drudge or the next Instapundit, and I think you probably do too. If that's going to happen, then we better find a way to vet and reward their type of content, including links to third-party articles and resources. Suggestions are welcome, but in the meantime I'd advise a little less skepticism over quality posts from known personalities around here.
What is Drudge's current monetization model for his aggregation and web curating service? (I have never used Drudge, so I don't know)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yea ... drudgereport is ranked like 22nd on Alexa for most visited page worldwide. Advertisements out the wazoo, no doubt.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Advertising. http://drudgereport.com
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
One solution is to make embedding content easier than copying it. That would encourage sharing from multiple sources and adding your own commentary over it, while giving credit and a built in link to the authors page.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I get the overall sentiment of the post, but perhaps Steemit can provide an opportunity to do better than Drudge, Instapundit, or any of the other current generation blogs and aggregators. They've largely served to provoke, aggravate, and antagonize, serving as cheerleaders for their side. They've contributed in a very large part to our current toxic political environment here in the US. Perhaps Steemit can be used as a platform to encourage conversation and cooperation, not just debate.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think the key to this is personal branding and implementation of tools and features within the SteemIt UX that allow for individuals to 'brand' themselves and the content they produce/curate.
-Being able to build a landing page and customize the structure and layout would be very interesting.
-landing page likes contribute/generate STEEM power
-leaderboard statistics
-contests for best post on a topic
Just a few ideas off the top of my head. Great concept!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Screw the next Matt Drudge. I'd rather see a thousand James O'Keefes on here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'd rather have both a thousand James's and a Matt.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
100% Agreed @sean-king
One thought I had, while I was comparing Steemit to Reddit: Maybe the key is just for the community here to get larger?
I don't know how many active users Steemit has, but it doesn't seem like a lot. I see posts and upvotes from the same curators pretty much every day. Once the population is bigger and we have more casual users going to the site for information, 2 cents per upvote might be a very big deal indeed.
For instance, go to the front page of Reddit and check out some of the metrics.
A helpful 2-sentence response to a question might get 300 upvotes in an hour. Easily. The top posts on the front page are getting 1500-3000 upvotes.
Maybe the whales are only whaling for the time being in an effort to replicate that kind or organic community interaction. Fake it until they make it.
If they gave everybody on the site more upvote power to make it "fair" right now, the financial system wouldn't be scalable to a larger community. Steemit would be shelling out thousands of dollars for posts that aren't attracting anything close to thousands of dollars worth of of attention.
Thoughts?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed. A larger audience will definitely help. 5 thousand upvotes at an average of 5 to 10 cents each adds up over time.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit