Big problem,
as good content doesn't get voted up.
I am looking forward to Dan Larimer's new products. I hope that he learned from the mistakes made with Steemit and will provide something more efficient, fair and without all the horseshit.
Not enough people curate by hand
7 years ago by shla-rafia (68)
$3.00
- Past Payouts $3.00
- - Author $2.72
- - Curators $0.27
18 votes
- + chhaylin: $0.883 (25%)
- + roelandp: $0.819 (1%)
- + ericvancewalton: $0.627 (100%)
- + lovejoy: $0.208 (100%)
- + norbu: $0.133 (10%)
- + simon.braki.love: $0.114 (100%)
- + b52tailgunner: $0.088 (50%)
- + dreamzchm: $0.038 (100%)
- + kooshikoo: $0.036 (15%)
- + vonnaputra: $0.017 (100%)
- + profitgenerator: $0.008 (100%)
- + saflia: $0.006 (100%)
- + maxpayne5: $0.005 (100%)
- + harvz: $0.005 (100%)
- + game-guru066: $0.002 (100%)
- + socrates1997: $0.002 (100%)
- + dansellcai: $0.001 (100%)
- + leojorgett: $0.001 (100%)
I am still new to steemit, but I was starting to suspect this. It seems like people are doing a lot of automated activity and it's lowering visibility for the real content.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It limits growth in user numbers. The people who have a lot don't care about growth as they already have more money as they need for a compfortbale life.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am hoping for a better of steemit as well as any new platform that comes out. I support people who appreciate quality contents and intention. Authentic stuff should always get recognition and that small token of appreciation helps in motivating one to create more quality content.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit