RE: One-Sixth of Author Reward Pool Diverted: Anatomy of a Culprit

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

One-Sixth of Author Reward Pool Diverted: Anatomy of a Culprit

in steemit •  8 years ago 

Some thoughts:

Why not drop the value of self-posts? Halve the value of them, or some other percentage?

Alternatively, could de-incentivize self-votes in other ways, like increasing their voting power costs exponentially with each one.

Or, once you are over a certain # of followers or SP, your self-votes do not count at all. The idea being that you now have a community enough to vote your posts and are less dependent on your own vote.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I like your second and third ideas -- subtle and effective!

You have to take into account multi-accounting, so only the second idea would work if you would get lower rewards each time you upvote the same author in a certain time period (week?).

I've just published another idea on how to counter self-voting by de-incentivizing it. Read about it in my latest article Curation problems (incentive, rewards and self-voting).