Just to clarify a few things in this post since I think there is some confusion on how earning through curating works. It's unfortunate, but the documentation that is show in the post is very very out of date (not the authors fault, since it is shown on the a steem.io webpage even though it's not linked into the home page.)
There are some things that have been added, changed as well as aspects not somewhat hidden in the math.
Examples of this include the post payout split now being 75% to the author and 25% to curators (which used to be 50/50) and a percentage penalty applied to people who vote before the post is 30 minutes old.
One other part that may not have been fully spelled out in that webpage was that how much Steem Power you have effects what you receive for curation rewards, essentially tranlated into the vote payout weight calculation.
let total_vote_reward = 50% of the content reward
let steem_power = the total STEEM power of the vote
let current_total_steem_power = the combined STEEM power of all past votes
let new_total_steem_power = current_total_steem_power + steem_power;
let vote_payout_weight = steem_power * (steem_power/new_total_steem_power)^2
with the final calculation being
let total_vote_payout_weight = sum vote_payout_weight for all votes on the post
Unfortunately, having little Steem Power means earning fewer curation rewards. While I can see how it can be frustrating if somebody expected without wither building up or buying into a larger account...I don't see how the economics could work if every single person who joined got large rewards from voting. It's one of the few remaining benefits to holding larger amounts of Steem Power.
You can find some of this spelled out a little more clearly here.
None of this is meant to blame the author of this post, but I did want to clear up what I think was a misunderstanding due to that webpage being out of date (and not linked to the steem.io home page). While I can get the frustration this might have caused, I don't really see it's accurate to call this a scam.
To be fair, within the post, I only referred to steemit as a hustle, a waste of time, f'ed up, crap, shit and a sham... haha. I apologize. I was misled, disappointed, confused and pissed off. I did however tag the post with the tag "scam" and have since removed that word. You are correct, that is an unfair tag. You know, the love and kindness and understanding represented within these comments is clear. I would say it's uncommon among social media comments. This community is different and the amount of encouragement here, rather than insult, is striking. And it's appreciated. I want to thank all those who have commented here for being as warm and genuine as you all have been. Thank you all.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think that's fair, thank you for removing that tag. That is where I ended up pulling the intended meaning of scam from.
I really do understand where you were coming from and didn't want to seem like I was attacking you. My goal was purely to provide clarification for any other readers. :)
I do wish you the best of luck on steemit! And not bad making a little money on this post, hehe.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The payout on this is incredibly ironic, isn't it? Thank you @sykochica.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
True true...but if it's made useful for others to learn..I'm all for it. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit