For one, something needs to be done about people who have hundreds of fake accounts for self-upvotes. Another would be some kind of mechanism to prevent the abuse of the flagging feature.
No platform can exist without some kind of RULES to prevent this sort of... unpleasantness. You can't just write in the dialog what flagging is for, then be okay with it when bullies and scammers simply ignore it, and use the feature to silence opinions. People with hundreds of fake profiles are abusing the system and using their scam-earned money to ensure only what THEY support and agree with has visibility. I would very much like to see this change. Wouldn't you?
RE: Why I am quitting steemit - and you should too
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why I am quitting steemit - and you should too
Why? They have the same effect as a single upvote if all of those accounts' stake were in one account. Whether it is 1 upvote or a thousand, the effect is the same.
Abuse according to whom? What sort of mechanism?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
bots created through Steemit acquire delegated stake, and therefore, when used to vote for the swarm controllers posts, scam Steem.
You know this. Clearly, you're using the Aristotelian dialog to demonstrate that @techslut already knows the answers to her questions.
While that would be effective, if condescending, if discussing something like mathematics, which you could have undeniably correct answers to, Steemit isn't mathematics, it's a social media platform, and therefore involves people, slightly more complex than algebra.
For example, your reply ignored botnets scamming the rewards pool. It also ignores that each alt used to post eventually acquires rep, which doesn't stack like SP, and constitutes a separate attack vector when such alts are used to flag, causing additional impact of such attack on rep, unlike a single account flagging.
Given your position, I find your coy questions less than substantive, particularly when you're insinuating half truths.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is no way to prevent any user from having multiple accounts on any decentralized, permissionless system.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes there is. There are more than one, in fact. People who make accounts through Steemit to get the delegated SP, so they can vote, provide a phone number, and those that do this to create botnets use fake, temporary numbers.
2FA ends both creating accounts this way, and having more bots than you have phones.
Anothe mechanism, which I personally detest, is captchas, at least a temporary fix, until AI gets smart enough to beat them.
You're smarter than me, and can prolly come up with even more.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually, you’re wrong because he can have a normal conversation unlike some random (self-proclaimed) slut. GFY - flagging you at -5% is no skin off my back.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm not sure what power you think he has, beyond the ability to inflate the vote count numbers, which is the same power that anyone has (anyone can create as many accounts as they wish).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're seriously implying that trashing someones rep, and attacking their rewards, doesn't even exist?
That's ridiculous, and insuperable. Perhaps you could enlighten me, if I've misunderstood your coment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit