If i was someone living off Steem posts i would definitely choose a proven service. Like i said, i support what you are doing, but there are literally no consequences for you if you pull the plug. All the users that stored their images into your server would have all their posts rendered useless.
RE: [STEEMIMG.COM] Dedicated STEEM Image hosting website.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
[STEEMIMG.COM] Dedicated STEEM Image hosting website.
I understand. And I wouldn't say no consequences. I myself host every image I post here on it and plan to be here a long time. I am, and will be, heavily investing my time and energy here. If I were to 'Pull The Plug' on this I don't think I would do very well anymore... Hated would more be the word. I defiantly do not want that to happen!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@valentinjesse. Very True on that first part, sorry I missed this comment earlier.
I won't be monetizing the site per say. I will use steem earned via posts about the service here in order to pay for server costs. I will defiantly need to scale and if the site catches on quickly. Hopefully the steem earned from the posts will cover these costs for the site to allow more and more images to be hosted. Now if it comes time where I am running close to the end of my funding and new posts aren't getting any support... I will discontinue uploads and just maintain the hosted images. I will be keeping a very close eye on this and be prepared if I think this might happen. At that point I mould reallocate my server to be better suited to just display and keep images. This I could maintain for quite some time without issue.
At that point maybe on blockchain images would exist.... I wonder...
I just had a very interesting thought. I will get back to everyone on that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Blue, can you pay off the hosting company for 10 years in advance or something and even if you bail out, the worst that can happen is space will run out and ppl won't be able to add more pictures.
Would that build more trust in the service @valentinjesse?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@anduweb I have websites that I've hosted for over 12 years and yes I could get a dedicated high end server and get it set up for 10 years.
However, I know you guys don't know me in real life, but they only way I wouldn't continue to host the site is (atleast all images currently hosted):
if I died suddenly and the person I have set up in my will to continue running my servers (Yes I do have this person - Because I own A LOT of servers and websites, trust me) also died without enough time to set up someone to continue for himSorry a bit morbid and... Knock on Wood
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@anduweb - Nope, you can't pay for 10 years in advance, because you cannot predict the rate of adoption of the service. If all of a sudden thousands or hundreds of thousands of users would start storing their images into steemimg, it would go over the quota and useless very fast. In the case of a dedicated high end server it would be the same. You need to scale, otherwise your business dies. There's a reason for why Imgur needed 40M in funding. Secondly, how do you monetize the business ? There are countless of issues
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Blue, knock on wood indeed! I know what you are saying. The thing is, people need some sort of proof that the system will be working. Not always our word (or resume) is enough unfortunately :(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@valentinjesse: I'm not saying you are emphasizing a wrong point. What I'm saying is that by paying in advance you are making an investment into the solution (not 40M but still).
For starters, this should be proof that whatever happens, already stored images are safe for 10 years and you don't have to worry about broken links in your editable posts for 10 years.
Secondly, it shows you are dedicated to the solution and going with it for long term.
When you evaluate such tools, I have to give @blueorgy some credit that you also need to look at the dev's resume. That should also count as trust.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I respectfully disagree. This is an investment of trust and money from which i gain nothing back (if i use his service and upvote for the cause). I need to be incentivized in order to use such a risky platform instead of a proven one (the killer features that could make me risk and switch are not there). From what i see, i'm not getting any shares into the company either.
In regards to those 10 years, i hope that you've read my post on the subject. You can't pay 10 years in advance when the unpredictability of the adoption is this high. If thousands/hundreds of thousands of users start using the platform, you will have to deal with scalability issues. How do you solve the scalability issues when you don't have a monetization plan or VC funding ? You simply can't. You just shutdown the service and let everything die or just rely on some whales for the upvotes, but that won't last for long when your expenses will start going up exponentially.
Even if you could pay for 10 years, we're adopters of blockchain technologies in here, so 10 years would be a joke. As blockchain supporters we want decentralized services with as much uptime/file availability as possible. Recording the history with possible broken links is not the way to go.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You have the right to disagree. Absolutely, no problem.
I did read your post but you haven't really read mine. I'm not saying that paying for 10 years includes new user adoption but at least provides some insurance that what is currently there remains there and doesn't impact current users of any platform because the information is still there. I don't find the 10 years as a small amount of time. At the rate things are advancing I'm quite sure solutions will soon include all the post information (including images) directly into the blockchain and have them there forever. Or any other solution. 10 years is a long time in which innovation is sure to happen and tbf, in 10 years, I think we'll look at this post and laugh of its stone-age style.
What I do feel to emphasize is that the devs need to be creative and provide some sort of assurance that encourages users to use the platforms and assure them that we are in for the long run. Each dev's resume is one thing to be considered and I also happen to suggest a 10 year commitment for the minimum functionality to be available as ensured. Is that too small? Is that enough? I don't know. But it's 10 years where your posts (int his case) will have their images listed. If anything happens down the road it would be plenty of time to think about backup solutions or maybe those 10 year old posts won' matter anymore.
I really don't want to turn this into a contradictory discussion. I respect your position but I also think what I'm saying is feasible.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit