Steemocracy : A Steem Comic | Volume 12 | &quot;STELLAAAAA &amp; The Viking&quot;

clayking (47) · 8 years ago

He is totally calm and rational being...... lol
https://steemit.com/steemit/@clayking/women-are-abused-on-steemit

$0.59

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago

$0.59

https://steemit.com/synereo/@fyrstikken/why-on-earth-would-i-chose-synereo-over-steemit-synereo-does-not-even-exist

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago

Hey @tuck-fheman this is not comedy, this is harassment. What the hell is wrong with you? - @fyrstikken

Interesting take, considering the comic is almost verbatim (and in one frame, exactly verbatim) of your words from the linked comments. Do you now deny saying any of those things, which are on the blockchain forever?

Instead of just crying, "harassment", please show all us where exactly it is in this COMIC that you feel that I'm "harassing" you. I'd be really interested how your own words are harassing you, when your own words were directed at others.

For anyone who missed the link at the top of this comic (which was always there)

The words coming out of this cartoon characters mouth above are quotes from @fyrstikken directed towards myself, @stellabelle and "minnows" (others) on Steemit. This comic was simply pointing out this absurd behavior from @fyrstikken and is in NO WAY harrassment, unless of course you consider his own comments towards myself and others harassment and if you do, then yes this is harassment from @fyrstikken towards me and others being pointed out in this comic. Funny how no one was upset with his slander from the below post. The whales gave him $1,648 for slandering stellabelle.

$0.57

oumar (57) · 8 years ago (edited)

Oh my gosh! This thing cracked me up!!! I wish my vote could really represent how much I liked this! But you know I wasn't into Bitcoins in 1979 so I am not rich and cannot power up. LOL!

$0.16

14 votes

jako (59) · 8 years ago

hehe, brilliant ^^

kyriacos (71) · 8 years ago

@tuck-fheman

Oups, you didn't again!

14 votes

ervin-lemark (71) · 8 years ago

Six monitors? This is even better than the Arthur:

12 votes

blackjincrypto (58) · 8 years ago

lol bro @tuck-fheman
cheers

meesterboom (78) · 8 years ago

Hehe, this is great. I particularly like the prefacing of words with "the" - cracks me up man!!

thecryptofiend (74) · 8 years ago

Hahaha I have also been in the bitcoins since 1979 and so I can say that this is hilarious!

Anyway I'm going to be away for a while. Keep up the great work while I'm gone!

$0.08

royalmacro (72) · 8 years ago

wow !

$0.07

breathe3000 (49) · 8 years ago (edited)

Great post! LOL! Good job! I writing also about @stellabelle! I agree with you! Well done! Thanks! Upvoted!
my Old post about stella https://steemit.com/steemit/@breathe3000/up-or-down-democracy-or-monarchy-fraud-or-integrity

$0.07

mynameisbrian (73) · 8 years ago

Your posts are quickly becoming my favorites. I'm glad that @stellabelle pimped one of your posts during the controversy with @fyrstikken, otherwise I might not have found these gems.

Keep on Steemin

$0.06

logic (67) · 8 years ago (edited)

It is so good and accurate! You may not like me (just my impression sometimes) but I really like your posts :p

Not all of his videos are bad. Some are quite funny but most of his videos with his puppets and steemspeak verbal masturbation are the actual Steemit muppet show.
And lets not forget that he got bought his first 6 laptops few years ago ;-)
It was very thoughtful of him to mention how wealthy and amazing he is.

I'm glad then you don't give up criticism and satire and keep posting this. That you are not afraid of standing up and risk being excluded from being upvoted by Whale Steem Club.

I posted criticism today. I am already blacklisted by whales but I don't care.
https://steemit.com/health/@logic/the-unfairness-on-steemit-can-literally-make-people-seriously-depressed-or-even-suicidal-this-is-serious

$0.06

3 votes

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago

blacklisted.steemit.com - There's a reason it's unreachable. [/conspiracy!]

;)

$0.00

logic (67) · 8 years ago (edited)

@tuck-theman
By the way, I have just thought. If the get offended by your parody, you can send them this :-D
https://steemit.com/life/@knozaki2015/why-we-should-stop-getting-offended-featuring-logic-as-author
I hope that it won't get flagged though, if they don't get it :-)

$0.03

9 votes

logic (67) · 8 years ago

Hah :-)

$0.00

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago

I still can't believe no one commented on the tinfoil viking helmet. ;)

$0.00

logic (67) · 8 years ago

ah so it is tinfoil haha.
Sorry I thought it was some sort of weird vikking leather or something. I didn't pay enough attention. Now I can see haha.
After having so many monitors, even viking tinfoil hat is not going to proetct him from their radiation.

$0.08

clevecross (59) · 8 years ago

I never thought about taking ALL factors into consideration..... Exactly how many monitors does @stellabella have?
I need to know in order to make an informed decision!!

arcange (73) · 8 years ago

Awesome ! When a cartoon by Tuck on Tuck ?

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago

Oh I'm sure someone will have one poking fun at me sooner or later. I look forward to it! Maybe my own puppet show by fyrstikken! :)

$0.00

mrgreen (64) · 8 years ago (edited)

ahahahahaaahhh) Tuck. Dude. it was brilliant!!!))))

akareyon (59) · 8 years ago

I don't listen to the show regularly, but I heard the "Helloooow" through my monitor :D

^{Yes, I only have one monitor.}

xanoxt (61) · 8 years ago (edited)

Wow, right. After a post on censorship you get censored! Nice demonstration. :->
Still, my upvote, even if I don't know whos the basis for Mr Tinfoil helmet. Kind of crypto noob, and stumbled upon the whole thing while in the backwoods, with few internets. But now I am back to civilization, I can even read all of your comic.
Oh, glad thenflags were removed!

sigmajin (65) · 8 years ago

I saw on The Path that they use Ayahuasca root there. That said, i assume the viking comes from fyrstikken being a big guy. Not sure how you could resist "steellla vs a streetcar named fyrstikken " as a title...

$0.04

ossama-benjohn (52) · 8 years ago

I can't stop .....

$0.00

reveur (65) · 5 years ago (edited)

Necro posting or necro replying i just saw this in GP's server and loved it.

But i want to add that: A few months ago almost one year, Tikken digned to talk to me over voice (for the very time) he of course told me to get a group of investors and do what he did and all that. (which in itself is not a bad idea if you can handle 10 people asking you why the shitcoin you bought with their money for 1.27$ is only worth 14 cents today... Whichis something i have lived with for hte last 2 years hahaha )

But apart from that, at that time steem was trading for 0000008000 satoshis... and i hinted that i was getting rid of it.

He told me cryptically that he would not be surprised to see it soon at 00000016000 i didnt really beleived him as the T.A indicated more 000000005000 and i did not listen to him and sold.... well guess what... steem hit the 15000 for a while and even touched brifly the 16000 with the theycallmedan and the blackguy who puts indians to make pushups in twitter hustle.... so i learned to listen to him, even thought i left his server for some reason and havent heard form him ever again....

Shoudl i make a post about this?

Would you be nice enough to illustrate the post?
I will happily share with you the odd 0.20 cents i get from my self vote.

$0.00

michaellamden68 (69) · 8 years ago

$0.00

cryptogee (75) · 8 years ago

Well this could get interesting!

$0.00

jsteck (53) · 8 years ago

Just did

$0.00

happyphoenix (66) · 8 years ago

shitcoin (sht) ha...ha... ! :)

$0.00

dan-bn (38) · 8 years ago

Why are you so unpolite !!! You are no more little boys and girls biting each others when parents are not here. When someone like this guy is so dirty, stop talking with him, that's all. When he is alone with his millions dollars, who cares ?

$0.00

proctologic (61) · 8 years ago

So you became a cyber-bully now?

$0.00

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago

Like I told you in slack/chat those are his words directed at me and others. Everything in this comic happened in the post linked to at the top. Please remove your flag. I'm simply pointing out what he said in another post where he slanders @stellabelle and makes condescending comments.

$0.00

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago (edited)

Perhaps you should be flagging the actual cyber-bully @fyrstikken? The guy slandering people, calling women "c-nts" and telling them to "suck d-ck". I'm simply posting excerpts and quotes of his own words (in a humorous way) that he directed at others, including myself. I hope you will reconsider your position and direct your flag at the proper person.

$0.00

fyrstikken (75) · 8 years ago

$0.00

Reveal Comment

https://steemit.com/synereo/@fyrstikken/why-on-earth-would-i-chose-synereo-over-steemit-synereo-does-not-even-exist

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago (edited)

Instead of just crying, "harassment", please show all us where exactly it is in this COMIC that you feel that I'm "harassing" you. I'd be really interested how your own words are harassing you, when your own words were directed at others.

For anyone who missed the link at the top of this comic (which was always there)

The words coming out of this cartoon characters mouth above are quotes from @fyrstikken directed towards myself, @stellabelle and "minnows" (others) on Steemit. This comic was simply pointing out this absurd behavior from @fyrstikken and is in NO WAY harrassment, unless of course you consider his own comments towards myself and others harassment and if you do, then yes this is harassment from @fyrstikken towards me and others being pointed out in this comic. Funny how no one was upset with his slander from the below post. The whales gave him $1,648 for slandering stellabelle.

$1.41

16 votes

clayking (47) · 8 years ago

He's just trying to stifle anyone saying anything bad about him. Have had him and his accounts flag every post I have done so far about a similar freak out with @heiditravels I have put up.

$0.56

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago (edited)

Well, I didn't say anything bad about him at all. I just quoted his own words. But I get flagged for it, he gets $1,600 for making up stories about others (I think that's called "slander") and then saying the things in this comic above in the comments section of that post. Odd.

$0.00

clayking (47) · 8 years ago

Unfortunately I had to resort to an alt account created to address it. Worries about repercussions being apparently very valid. And I am aware you didn't, poor word choice my end.

$0.63

sigmajin (65) · 8 years ago (edited)

@tuck-fheman

So I can just make stuff up about another person, create fictional events and name them as perpetrating those events and profit off of it because they may be considered a public figure? That just doesn't sound right.

The case i cited is pretty well known (it appeared in "the people vs. larry flynt"). In it, the Magazine hustler published a fictional satiric interview with television preacher Jerry Falwell. In this made up interview, Falwell described, in detail, having drunken sex with his own mother in an outhouse.

The court concluded (in part) that:

This case presents us with a novel question involving First Amendment limitations upon a State's authority to protect its citizens from the intentional infliction of emotional distress. We must decide whether a public figure may recover damages for emotional harm caused by the publication of an ad parody offensive to him, and doubtless gross and repugnant in the eyes of most. Respondent would have us find that a State's interest in protecting public figures from emotional distress is sufficient to deny First Amendment protection to speech that is patently offensive and is intended to inflict emotional injury, even when that speech could not reasonably have been interpreted as stating actual facts about the public figure involved. This we decline to do.

At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern.

you write:

I could back this false narrative up with chat logs which show they use known operative techniques of disruption and deflection when caught in lies using multiple sockpuppet accounts to push unwanted critique out of other users sight while backing their own claims with false support, all while never responding to their accusers questions, but instead attempting to discredit those questioning them in the public's eye ... and I could profit from such an obviously bullshit story?

Yes, you defintiely could. And its good that you could.. to further quote hustler v falwell (which addresses this very issue)

the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas -- that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market. . . . The sort of robust political debate encouraged by the First Amendment is bound to produce speech that is critical of those who hold public office or those public figures who are intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large.

The basic idea here is that it i have to worry that a certain characterization of someone elses ideas, or the motives underlying them, will hurt their feelings, it will lead to a chilling effect and self censorship. Especially if the person in question in one that shapes public policy.

$0.58

sigmajin (65) · 8 years ago

its actually called libel (slander is spoken). That said, neither post would probably qualify as libel. see 485 U.S. 46

In the limited scope of the steemiverse, all of you would prob. qualify as public figures.

$0.07

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago (edited)

@sigmajin

its actually called libel (slander is spoken). That said, neither post would probably qualify as libel. see 485 U.S. 46

Thanks, corrected.

That said, neither post would probably qualify as libel. see 485 U.S. 46

So I can just make stuff up about another person, create fictional events and name them as perpetrating those events and profit off of it because they may be considered a public figure? That just doesn't sound right.

But, if that's the case, I could hypothetically claim that certain individuals here on Steemit are purposefully creating havoc with lies to disrupt the Community while setting themselves up as some sort of leader, recruiting people to honeypot websites to gain their IP information and asking them to talk on a recorded show to possibly incriminate these individuals and/or to entice them into discussing or committing an illegal act unknowingly, while using the operatives ties from their former employer who is known to hire government agents to spread disinformation and propaganda.

I could back this false narrative up with chat logs which show they use known operative techniques of disruption and deflection when caught in lies using multiple sockpuppet accounts to push unwanted critique out of other users sight while backing their own claims with false support, all while never responding to their accusers questions, but instead attempting to discredit those questioning them in the public's eye ... and I could profit from such an obviously bullshit story?

Wow, America the beautiful! ;)

$0.03

logic (67) · 8 years ago

OMG he is sooooo offended!
https://steemit.com/life/@knozaki2015/why-we-should-stop-getting-offended-featuring-logic-as-author

$0.00

clayking (47) · 8 years ago

Interesting stance on harrasment

$0.89

14 votes

demotruk (69) · 8 years ago

On its own, I don't see that. It's just satire, why should the depicted people be immune from satire?

If it's part of a larger pattern of harassment, then I can understand that PoV.

clayking (47) · 8 years ago

Really?

$0.56

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago (edited)

Thanks for posting these. He needs to be held accountable, especially after making more false accusations. Libel was not enough for him apparently.

Edit : corrected slander to libel.

$0.00

https://steemit.com/steemitabuse/@fyrstikken/throw-away-accounts-is-a-problem-i-suggest-that-in-order-to-be-allowed-to-flag-a-post-the-account-flagging-needs-to-have-a

sigmajin (65) · 8 years ago (edited)

tuck -- look up @ezrathecat and this post about his downvote of one of fyrstikken's posts

"I work too damn hard on my posts to have them visually ruined by some asshole-nobody that has a bad hair-day"

In retaliation for this dude downvoting one single post of fyrst's, fyrst and a bunch of his possi went through and downvoted every single thing this dude had ever posted (all of which was innocuous animal related stuff).

Fyrst and kyle have a bunch of choice quotes in ezara's threads which they left as they were downvoting

https://steemit.com/news/@ezrathecat/bilderberg-do-you-know-the-truth

then im sure we'll all scratch our h ead and wonder why we're having problems with adoption.

after all, how dare these asshole-nobodies not be interested in being treated like shit on our glorious platform

$0.55

acidyo (80) · 8 years ago (edited)

I expect an open apology at least.

That behavior isn't appropriate even if she had stood him up and they had set a date and everything. Doing this on a public channel seems even more absurd... I can understand if people have bad days and take it out the way he did, but at least they realize their mistake and apologize.
To accuse @heiditravels of being fake is even more ridiculous. I have followed her on instagram where she used to post even before Steemit and also on her Snapchat she verifies her travels.

$0.54

tuck-fheman (74) · 8 years ago

Flagging for false accusation. Using your own words in a comic character is not harassment.

$0.00