It's hard to say anything about a paper unless we can look at the data... not saying it's also true here, but I remember the controversy over the gravitational waves observation claim and how it turned out to be noise from cosmic dust, lol.
RE: Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
well there is some data in the paper, and as this is an accelerator experiment things are much better controlled than in astronomy, but indeed the gravitational polarisation of the BICEP2 experiment also included a difficult background (dust that time) that they had difficulty modelling well
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
and in this field, like most of physics, all papers are made public as preprints, you can take a look yourself here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12028
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I understand... very few of these words.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
well it is a scientific paper... but the data is there :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit