To be completely clear I very much doubt that you are conducting an objective assessment. I think it far more likely that you are pumping a political ideology or are simply a troll. I will not waste my time further with this discourse other than to say that anybody who takes you at all seriously is a fool, and I advise them to write a letter to the Chair of Climatology at any respected, accredited university. I have done so, and so should you.
RE: A Discussion About Climate Change – Part 1: Milankovitch Cycles
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
A Discussion About Climate Change – Part 1: Milankovitch Cycles
The beauty of this world is that you are entitled to believe whatever you choose. I assure you I am neither a troll nor someone trying to pump a political ideology, just a geologist attempting to discuss an extremely polarizing issue. There is no need to call other people names in an attempt to undermine my credibility. I encourage you to direct your favorite Doctor of Climatology to check out the posts and see if they agree!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you hold a Doctorate you should know better than to publish such a feeble exercise in false equivalence. Are you interested in the opinions of Gastroenterologists about tectonic plate movements? No? That's essentially what you're doing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit