How the recently observed light from the Cosmic Dawn impacts dark matter

in steemstem •  7 years ago  (edited)

Hydrogen is the most common gas in our universe, and it makes up to about 75% of the universe mass. It is consequently expected that studying hydrogen-related observables could allow for a better understanding of the fundamental characteristics of our universe.


[image credits: Wikipedia]

In this post, I discuss recent results of the EDGES experiment (shown in the picture on the left), a project investigating hydrogen signatures of the very early universe.

Some intriguing signals of the cosmic dawn epoch (i.e. the coolest period of the universe history for what concerns matter, that also corresponds to the moment at which the first stars appeared) have been published earlier this month. Physicists immediately took the opportunity to cook a dark matter explanation.

This however does not seem to work that greatly. And as usual, note that something stupid is hidden in the post ;)


THE BIG BANG THEORY IN A NUTSHELL

Standard cosmology relies on the Big Bang hypothesis in which our Universe started to exist more or less 13 billion years ago. After a very short period of inflation, one ends up with a super-hot cosmic soup of matter and energy, in which particle-antiparticle pairs are continuously created and annihilated.


[image credits: Wikipedia]

At the same time, the universe is expanding, which makes it cool down.

With the associated decrease in temperature, the dynamics in the cosmic soup changed, and after a short amount of time, for some reasons physicists are still trying to understand, baryons were generated and antimatter disappeared.

This is known as baryogenesis, which leads, at the end of the day, to the creation of neutrons and protons.

Within 10 minutes, neutrons and protons started to form the lightest atomic nuclei, namely deuterium, helium and lithium. And for the record, hydrogen was already there (a hydrogen nucleus is just a proton). This is what we call Big Bang nucleosynthesis.

After a few of hundreds of thousands of years of cool down and expansion, atomic nuclei and electrons recombined to form atoms. As a results, all matter in the universe was electrically neutral, and the light released at this time is still visible today.

With very few electrically charged particles, photons can indeed travel almost unperturbed within the universe. This is what we call the cosmic microwave background (or the CMB). It is very precisely measured, for instance, by the Planck experiment, which allows for getting information on what happened in the early days of the universe.


THE COSMIC DAWN

The above-described period is traditionally known as the Dark Age of the universe, as consequence of the fact that there was just no light other than the CMB and the famous 21.1cm hydrogen line.

This ‘line’ corresponds to the transition between the two hydrogen ground states with total spins respectively equal to 0 or 1. This is a crucial number as in the low temperature conditions of the universe at that time, it consists of the only observable hydrogen transition.

From there, gravity started to work, and the universe ended up in being comprised of huge clouds of hydrogen that then gravitationally collapsed to form the first stars.


[image credits: Wikipedia]

The ignition of the first stars marks the beginning of the Cosmic Dawn era.

By burning, those stars lit up the surrounding gas (mostly hydrogen) and ionized it again, protons and electrons being broken apart and ejected out of the neutral clouds.

After the reionization process being complete (i.e. roughly 1 billion years after the Big Bang), light of many different wavelengths have escaped and spread all around the Universe. Such a light is observable today.

However, who says charged particles also says that electromagnetism can now play a role again. Excited protons could interact with the CMB at very specific wavelengths, leaving thus imprints as dips in brightness at given points in the CMB spectrum.

By studying these dips and light from these early times (that comes from very far away in the universe as a consequence of the universe expansion), one hopes to get probes of this early reionization epoch. In particular, the 21cm line above-mentioned is the best hope for understanding what has gone on at that time.


CHASING DIPS WITH EDGES


[image credits: Wikipedia]

The EDGES experiment consists in a radio-telescope located in western Australia, far far away from anyhuman (radio-wave) activity.

Its goal is to focus on detecting the light associated with the 21.1cm hydrogen transition that is originating from the reionization epoch.

This is achieved through a broadband antenna covering the 50-100 MHz range, as this range corresponds to the frequency of light that should have been emitted during reionization.

By virtue of the expansion of the universe, light from very far was emitted long long long ago. This consists thus of the light we should search for. It is pretty challenging to detect it for varied reasons. First, because the initial frequency has been redshifted (this is simply a Doppler effect), so that the detected frequency is different from the emitted one. In addition, there are plenty of sources of radio-waves all along the way to us, which may swamp the signal.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Despite of all complications, the EDGES experiment managed to observe two dips in the light energy spectrum. The first one suggests that the Cosmic Dawn occurred about 180.000.000 years after the Big Bang. However, a second dip was observed at about 250.000.000 years after the Big Bang. This corresponds to the period of time at which the first stars started to die and form the first black holes and supernovae.


[image credits: Wikipedia]

By analyzing the magnitude of the dip, it has been found that hydrogen has been absorbing much more radiation than expected. We talk about a factor of 2 difference, more or less, when comparing data to predictions.

We have here a new puzzle!


This indeed suggests that the universe was much colder than expected. And this is where dark matter comes in. At the same moment of the universe history, dark matter is at its coldest phase as well. It may thus cool down the hydrogen gas, which could then induce a larger absorption in the spectrum.

However, in order to reproduce data, the dark matter properties must be such that it becomes very hard to accommodate any other dark matter experimental results. Theoretical options are nonetheless available, sa soon as dark matter is made of several species of particles. More information on this can be found in this research article.

For further pieces of information, please have a look to this (shamefully non open access) article on the EDGES results.


SteemSTEM is a community-driven project that now runs on Steem for more than 1.5 year. We seek to build a community of science lovers and to make the Steem blockchain a better place for Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).

More information can be found on the @steemstem blog, on our discord server and in our last project report. Please also have a look on this post for what concerns the building of our community.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Reading this article, I am realising that Steemstem is becoming my primary source of cosmology news! Cool article, @Lemouth.

Comments:

The first one suggests that the Cosmic Dawn occurred about 180.000 years after the Big Bang. However, a second dip was observed at about 250.000 years after the Big Bang.

I suppose you mean 180 Million and 250 Million years respectively, because I do not see how the first stars could form in the plasma before the emission of the CMB!

Some intriguing signals of the cosmic dawn epoch (i.e. the coolest period of the universe history also corresponding to the moment at which the first stars appeared)

I don't understand this. Considerinf the universe as a black body, temperature at a given time is determined by the average wavelength of CMB radiation. Saying that the coolest period of the universe was in the past does not make sense to me (Reason: Red Shift of CMB due to expansion of space).

And a little wink ;-)

This ‘line’ corresponds to the transition between the two hydrogen ground states with total spins respectively equal to 0 or 1. This is a crucial number as in the low temperature conditions of the universe at that time, it consists of the only observable hydrogen transition.

The hypertext link about the crucial number leads the reader to SETi's wikipedia page. was this intended?

Thanks for this great article. it was the first time I met the EDGES experiment!

Thanks a lot for your comments! You are right twice :)

I suppose you mean 180 Million and 250 Million years respectively, because I do not see how the first stars could form in the plasma before the emission of the CMB!

Good catch! A bunch of zeros decided to stay inside the keyboard. It is fixed :)

I don't understand this. Considerinf the universe as a black body, temperature at a given time is determined by the average wavelength of CMB radiation. Saying that the coolest period of the universe was in the past does not make sense to me (Reason: Red Shift of CMB due to expansion of space).

My wording is in fact not appropriate and sloppy. I was actually not meaning the temperature of the universe (even if this is what I wrote), but the temperature of the hydrogen gas instead. Before star formation, the primordial gas just cools adiabatically. I will fix the post in a minute.

The hypertext link about the crucial number leads the reader to SETi's wikipedia page. was this intended?

Yes! The 21.1cm transition plays a big role in extra-terrestrial intelligence searches.

I like cosmology and particle physics. Unfortunately the scope of the research work and the associated equipment required to do them are just so huge that I find it mind-boggling just how the scientists manage to make any progress at all. I mean, observing the effects of a 21.1cm hydrogen line that came about due to events that took place at least 12 billion years ago should be impossible.

But reading your article, I began to realize that even though the Universal timescales may seem too long for us humans, it certainly isn't too long for the universe itself, therefore, it retains vestiges of the events that have occurred in it in the form of electromagnetic energy.

However, I was not able to find the "something stupid" you mentioned here:

This however does not seem to work that greatly. And as usual, note that something stupid is hidden in the post ;)

Perhaps, I don't know enough of particle physics to have noticed the hidden information. Maybe you will kind enough to point it out for me :)

I mean, observing the effects of a 21.1cm hydrogen line that came about due to events that took place at least 12 billion years ago should be impossible.

It was really really tough. The signal over background ratio is of about 1/10000. But astronomers managed to build an apparatus and an analysis method allowing to extract this signal.

However, I was not able to find the "something stupid" you mentioned here:

Well, if you find it, you will definitely notice it is stupid. Hint: check all comments to my post.

Thank you for your reply. I have scoured the post much like the cosmologists looking for evidence from the formative years of the Universe. Well, definitely not that thoroughly. But apart from the link to SETi, I can't find anything else. I'm certain I need help from a more experienced person to find something stupid in this post :)

You also need to scour the comments :p

Okay. Let me do that again :)

Have you found it?

The party is over. I have found it. Somehow, I feel a sense of satisfaction even though I found it late with two different pointers. And it is in French!

Thanks for your patience!

Ahaha ^^

Thanks for sharing @lemouth!

At the same moment of the universe history, dark matter is at its coldest phase as well. It may thus cool down the hydrogen gas, which could then induce a larger absorption in the spectrum.

Does that basically mean that scientists are absolutely aware of the way ordinary matter interacts with dark matter and vice versa? After learning from a previous post of yours how dark matter is actually not electromagnetically interacting, I was wondering whether there could be any sort of differences regarding transmission of heat between ordinary and dark matter.

p.s. : I'd love to read a post of yours regarding the quantum entanglement theory and discuss whether this reality could actually be a computer simulation.

Nice read!

Does that basically mean that scientists are absolutely aware of the way ordinary matter interacts with dark matter and vice versa?

There are indeed a few assumptions in there. A small number of reasonable assumptions yields realistic models, like the one described here.

After learning from a previous post of yours how dark matter is actually not electromagnetically interacting, I was wondering whether there could be any sort of differences regarding transmission of heat between ordinary and dark matter.

This occurs through elastic scattering. One dark particles meets one normal particle and exchange energy in one way or the other (but not electromagnetically).

p.s. : I'd love to read a post of yours regarding the quantum entanglement theory and discuss whether this reality could actually be a computer simulation.

I could try, but this is far fro my area of expertise. I could write a few things about quantum entanglement, but this will stay at the level of generalities. Sorry :)

Thanks for taking the time to respond! :)

I always do that :)

And I always say thanks :P

Interesting, thanks for sharing. I was unaware of this experiment that gives lights of what happened when the first generation of stars reionized the universe, I suppose that this will allow to determine the exact moment in which it happened. A question, how cold was it supposed to be the universe and what does that imply? Regards!

, I suppose that this will allow to determine the exact moment in which it happened

Yes, as we didn't know exactly when the cosmic dawn exactly occurred before that. Now we have an idea, although it may be wise to have an independent cross check.

A question, how cold was it supposed to be the universe and what does that imply?

Actually, by cold, I was meaning the hydrogen clouds and not the universe itself. For the gas, we are talking about a few kelvins. Is it what you had in mind?

Ok. I understood it as the universe itself, thank you for clarifying friend @lemount

My pleasure :)

Thank you for this informative article. I feel myself very desperate about that we are dependent on measurement setups like radio antennas for discovering the cosmos. As you stated in the article, the light which started to propagate very long time ago, becomes distorted due to doppler and any other kind of factors. There should be some other reliable methods to detect and measure such kind of cosmological events in the universe. Perhaps using and studying on gravitational waves could help us much more in the future.

Thanks for your comment and question!

Gravitational wave detection won't provide this kind of information as this is not connected to the detection of light. However, there is no reason to be so desperate. There is so much information buried in the light populating the cosmos. The only complication consists of the detection. We are designing sophisticated methods for that, and in addition, every single measurement needs to be double-checked independently. We are now in the process of waiting for the independent confirmation.

To be honest, I don't see how studying anything different from light could help here. By definition. I am however open to any suggestion :)

Thank you for your kind answer. Yes you’re right! Gravitational waves are not related this kind of studies. But suggestion of such a novel technology is not easy as you see. The light itself is the best information package for us to figure out what has happened in the universe and will happen (thanks to spectral analysis). We will be developing more reliable measurement methods based on light detection in the future maybe. Desperation comes from the fact that I am not an anticipation-lover kind of person to see the exact results 😊

But suggestion of such a novel technology is not easy as you see

I have never said it was easy. I don't foresee anything myself.

The light itself is the best information package for us to figure out what has happened in the universe and will happen (thanks to spectral analysis). We will be developing more reliable measurement methods based on light detection in the future maybe.

I am pretty confident that we will. Maybe not on a 4-5 years timescale, but on a couple of decades, this is clear. There are plenty of experiments being currently proposed, designed, etc.

Desperation comes from the fact that I am not an anticipation-lover kind of person to see the exact results

Ahah I see :)

After mentioning the cooking of dark matter explanations and talking about cosmic soups I'm hungry ;) I enjoyed reading your post, I think you may like a book by Philip Ball entitled H2O: A biography of water. It discusses how the stars were the engine of creation and how water was formed from this cosmic soup.

Thanks for passing by and the comment ;)

I am not sure about the nutrition data of the cosmic soup. I am positive for a bad indigestion in any case :D

I guess I'll go for pizza then ;)

With or without a platypus? (if you don't get the joke here, please google the two words together :p )

ahahah I was actually thinking about that when I said "pizza" ;)

This may become the future official steemstem running joke ;)

ahhahah I guess you may need a steemstem version of this logo :)

I can't find the platypus ;)

Those stars at the beginning must have been interesting objects to have formed and died within 100,000 years! I think they would have had to have been extremely massive supergiant stars.

ps. Still trying to find your hidden stupid item, maybe because it's early here and I'm not a morning person :)

Those stars at the beginning must have been interesting objects to have formed and died within 100,000 years! I think they would have had to have been extremely massive supergiant stars.

Those stars were very massive blue and short-lived stars.

ps. Still trying to find your hidden stupid item, maybe because it's early here and I'm not a morning person :)

You are Australian! Everything is always about Australia (at least here :p )

I'm a bit more awake and now I see "Le kangourou" :) !

Hehe. You see, it was not too hard :D

Merci Lemouth de me rendre plus instruite pour ce jour ! donc, la création repose sur des gaz et leur 'expression', et quelqu'un a dit : tout est vibration... ça se rejoint.

Au second degre, cela m'a fait bien rire :)

ha!ha! j'étais sûre que tu allais capter entre les lignes !

C'etait quand meme evident :D

Thanks for taking the time out to explain this subject with fascinating style and fashion. The issue of creation and origin of our universe has always been a controversial one with several theories alluding to several hypotheses. So thanks for sharing some more detail and insight about the cosmic dawn. I truly appreciate!

Well, we also have a so-called standard model and it works super well. This does not rule out alternatives, but I am not aware of any theory that reproduces data as good,

That sounds pretty good and interesting...will endeavour to look it up during my free time.

Just to emphasize my point. The standard model works super well, but there are still questions. With this respect, alternatives are important and must be searched for. However, up to now, they are, IMO, not as appealing.

You're chasing particles but I've caught your kangaroo.

That is just a jumping particle. A big one! :D

I’m very interested in the mysterious nature of dark energy and dark matter. I don’t have the physics background to understand the maths behind it, but your posts do a good job of making the basics understandable.

I am a bit puzzled by your comment. I didn't really talk about dark matter here (only a couple of sentences at the end of the post) and I don't even mention dark energy...

I’m a little obsessed with dark matter and dark energy. But you are right, that was a very minor part of this post.

Don't worry, you are not the only one being obsessed :)

Learning post dude.hpoe people will love it. your achievement is your assets dude.keep it up.

Well, I guess I should say thanks? :)

good post i have learned lot of things from this post

Are you sure? Have you really read my post? I am asking because I notice you are answering many posts with the very same comment...

Oh my God!😂😂😂😂😂

The absence of answer also speaks for itself ;)

Typical...

Unfortunately :)

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Thanks @etcmike for this @onlyprofitbot service ^^

there are always more puzzles after getting something solved))

Of course, otherwise it is not funny :)

Excellent post!. Thanks for sharing @lemouth. Very interesting this study. Regards.

My pleasure ^^

That there exists anything at all is a wonder to me!

I am not sure to have understood your comment. Do you mind being more specific? Thanks in advance ^^

Lol! Your post is cool. It is just a general remark. I tend to do that a lot. Never mind.

Okidooki! Then thanks for the remark :)