The Physiological Thrill of Using a Weapon

in steemstem •  6 years ago 

It's been longer than I'd hope to get this ready for you but here it is - the fascinating information about the Physiological effects of using weapons during a violent act.

It makes a fascinating subject and one which prompts the open mind to look more deeply into something we are sadly having to get used to in our "enlightened" times.

Source

Can a gun turn a gentleman into a monster? Can the physical act of holding and aiming a weapon increase the likelihood of violence? These are questions central to the ongoing conversation around the physiology of weapon use and violence, especially as in the current world we live in. With social and ethical enlightenment, use of weapons seem to paradoxically be on the increase.

Science sheds some light…

When a human picks up a weapon, the body’s adrenalin spikes, triggering an increase in the heart rate. Although these bodily reactions take only seconds, they can result in a mood-altering chemical release to the brain.
source

What are the actual implications of these bodily changes? Is there an actual physiological thrill to using a weapon that breaks the ‘learned’ acceptable behaviours we have?

The following will explore the neuroscience and physiology of weapon use. What exactly is happening on the pulling side of that trigger? Apparently, quite a bit of biology, unseen, unheard but potentially deadly.

In this case – it’s DOPE

For a quick lowdown - Dopamine is a major neurotransmitter, constituting one of the biggest signaling molecules in the brain. We feel the effects of dopamine release when we do things that make us happy, for example: when we’re pleasantly surprised or excited, curious, creative, have purpose – for instance during exercise, and more. It’s why we we feel better when we’ve found out something good or achieved that goal we’ve been aiming for - (dopamine plays its part in sexual arousal - Barry R. Komisaruk, PhD, professor of psychology at Rutgers University in Newark, New Jersey.)

The internal reflexes excite the brain and dopamine is the ‘lollypop’ the brain gets as a reward for dealing with whatever it was in a successful manner.

Dopamine is also closely related to the Fight or Flight reactions I have previously written about. Just think about your body when you have a fright, feel excited, achieved or aggressive or are getting aroused for that intimate moment. In all cases, the blood rushes, the heart rate has increased, skin moistens, breathing becomes a little faster, pupils dilate, hair stands on end… all to do with these amazing set of chemical reactions.

Dopamine belongs to the catecholamine family of neurotransmitters and produces the hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine, both of which play a role in the fight or flight response. Dopamine is metabolized from tyrosine and phenylalaline. Neurons that use dopamine as their primary neurotransmitter exist mostly in the midbrain.
source

The thing is, dopamine is also released whenever you encounter a mystery or take a risk. This is due to our brain’s incentive structure, which rewards exploratory attitudes and actions. Dopamine boosts skills through increased pattern recognition, attentiveness, information flow, heart rate, neurological quickness, and muscle firing time.

But on top of all these reactions, the primary function of dopamine is its role as a motivator. It is usually released when someone is expecting a reward. As dopamine is introduced into the brain, we hunger for even more of it until it becomes a preoccupation. This is a major driver of cocaine addiction. Drugs like cocaine function to increase dopamine but often have the consequence of hooking the user.

So Back To The Neuroscience of Firing a Gun

Firearms are perhaps the most deadly weapon known to man. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, up to 33,736 individuals die annually from gunshots.
source

Naturally, firing a gun presents a rather stark risk. It also represents mystery—where will the bullet land? What will the damage be? Firing a gun requires pattern recognition. Dopamine is created by the very act of picking up a gun, and this neurotransmitter puts you in the zone for better weapon use by increasing your pattern detection.

source

If you were to take an MRS or PET scan of someone leaving a firing range, you’d find plenty of dopamine in their body. This all raises an important question. If guns create chemical reactions similar to those generated by cocaine use, are weapons addictive? It would appear that yes: to an extent, they absolutely are – or at least the action of using a gun is – or any weapon for that matter.

It isn’t hard to conclude that all of this has a danger for human society. Addiction is a real problem afflicting millions, and if firearm use is addictive, it may cause its ‘addicts’ to constantly chase an ever dwindling high through violent acts.
With gambling or drug use, addiction creates serious social and economic harm. With gun use, the harms may be even more horrific. Sometimes – in countries where possessing a gun is legal and almost socially required the thrill-seeking actions haven’t even got any more restraint upon them that what we perceive to be socially or morally acceptable, until it’s happened – and by then it’s too late.

PAS at a shooting range – very pleased with himself – personal photograph.

Have you ever seen the look on a person’s face when they are cleaning or hold a gun, or how when a shot hits a target spot-on, the firer is exhilarated? I have – and at the time I had to wonder at why? Heck, I even tried it myself and felt a mini-rush when I fired (but missed).

The thrill of inflicting violence is a dark but important addition to this ‘sport’.
This phenomenon might explain the horrific behaviors of serial killers, which reflect a continuous escalation characteristic of addiction. To explore this, we move our discussion to how weapons and behaviour are linked.

The Weapon's Effect

Most of us are unaware just how much the presence of weapons affects our behaviour and attitudes. Studies show that the act of holding a gun can make a person more aggressive. The presence of a firearm, as well, can actually stimulate acts of violence.

According to Leonard Berkowitz, Emeritus Professor of Psychology at the University of Wisconsin:

"Guns not only permit violence, they can stimulate it as well. The finger pulls the trigger, but the trigger may also be pulling the finger.”

In recent research, a vehicle driver who carries a gun in his car tends to drive more recklessly and aggressively than one who doesn’t.

Using a national sample, more than 2000 American drivers demonstrate that drivers carrying a gun in their car tend to make more abusive gestures to other motorists than the control group. About 23% of the treatment group followed other cars too closely. About 14% of drivers with a gun in the car drove more aggressively.
(Social Psychology and Human Nature, Comprehensive Edition
By Roy F. Baumeister, Brad J. Bushman)

As humans, we are naturally able to quickly identify harmful stimuli. Guns are no doubt a threatening presence in social life. They are far more harmful than the physical threats faced by our pre-historic ancestors, such as spikes, spears, poison, etc., and yet our biological nature tends to recognise the force of the gun and react in kind. Sometimes this takes the form of a defensive adrenaline rush. But it turns out that the presence of a gun can also make us more aggressive, whether we are faced with it or whether we are holding it.

A review of 56 studies indicates that a mere look at a gun can escalate aggression in people who are already angry. This research confirms the weapons effect and its roots in human physiology.

Conclusion:

Though we know the dangerous nature of firearms, its use in violence incidents continues to climb. And ironically, as guns become more harmful, their use as instruments of leisure and entertainment persists. To understand this paradox, we need not look further than the physiological thrill inherent to weapon use - the dopamine ‘lollipop’ our brain craves.

There’s no denying that our brains are wired to marvel at the gun’s bright flash, our body’s reflexive jolt to pulling the trigger, and the gunpowder’s enduring odour is a wonderful scent to some. This emotional and physical rush helps explain intense support for gun use in certain parts of the world, but more darkly, it also suggests that our brains and bodies may be encouraging more than mere recreation. The studies (some listed below) strongly suggest that our survival wiring may cause us to feel more aggressive when in the presence of a weapon. This means the thrill is not simply in weapon use, but in violent weapon use.

These dark realisations may be concerning, but it’s important to remember that our neurology and physiology had to adapt to an age of pre-societal survival of the fittest. Today we are stuck with those systems. Though we hopefully have the strength to avoid violence and aggression, the chemical rush of weapon use will always be a fascinating, if chilling, phenomena.

Footnote:

Whilst this post is predominantly about the use of guns, the same actions and reactions can, and do, occur with any weapon used. This is why, I believe, people who get thrills in riots or gang-fights, physically bullying and abusing, or even parents who (used to?) go over the top with physical / corporal punishments would use sticks, batons, clubs, slippers, belts – anything but their hand. The primeval urge to attack followed by the thrill is a hard one to conquer.

Further reading and resources used.

Neuroscientificallychallenged.com
Medicaldaily.com
Infographic on Biology behind Shooting
Forbes.com
Psychologytoday.com
Gun News

Books to read

Behavioral Neuroendocrinology
edited by Barry R. Komisaruk, Gabriela González-Mariscal

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

That's really really interesting! You always hear that whole "Guns don't kill people, people kill people!" thing, but this information makes this ideology even more of a grey area!!

Its good to know that my point was understood. The more I look into the physical responses, the internal uncontrolled basal instincts, the more I begin to understand that blaming psychology, sociology, trends and fashions isn't all it. Thank you for reading.

I've only shot a gun once (a WWII rifle at a shooting range). It was a heck of a thrill and your description/analysis is pretty spot on.

Despite the rush, I'm not a big fan of guns given the violence in the US. Glad to have someone giving an objective analysis on this issue.

I too found the same. I Tried clay shooting with my ex and it was a buzz... but that buzz then worried me. I hate violence but I can understand emotional outbursts. Until i researched more into this I couldn't understand why a parent would beat a child til they bled or a bully would whip a worker in some countries still. We associate weapon with gun but its knife stick strap ... anything. Research has enlightened me somewhat and it appears many of us lack the understanding of how empowering the use of a weapon is. For me I now believe that MUST be added to the psyche and social pressure on humanity to be kind to one and other . It needs to be understood when we teach our children.
Uk its not so much a gun issue but knife crime is increasing rapidly especially amongst the youth. Saying "no" will never work. Education just might.
Thank you for engaging .

I live Switzerland. Where (almost) every able bodied man has his service rifle at home (and some women) and has to shoot his weapon at least once a year as part of the militia training.

You can buy ammunition with a criminal record certificate. Same for buying a weapon. A clean criminal record is enough to get a weapons acquisition certificate.

With the result that Switzerland is on Place 4 for guns per 100 residents. Yet Switzerland is on Place 147 for murder rate.

For comparison: the United Kingdom is on place 71 for murder rate and there you are not allowed to carry anything considered a weapon. Which even includes butter knifes. The Rowan Atkinson clip where Mr. Brean makes himself a sandwich in the park isn't possible in real live as you are not allowed to carry a butter knife in public in England.

There must be something else between feeling powerful because you carry a weapon and actually drawing the weapon and using it to do violence.

This depends on the psychology of the people in question. Switzerland is likely to have a well developed and well controlled culture. This is what the stereotype suggests at the very least. We can see in examples like France that high consumption of saturated fats and alcohol do not necessarily predict obesity and alcoholism rates, due to the appropriate conditioning being present from birth. The Swiss custom, insofar as I understand it, is to carry a rifle in case of invasion, thereby protecting the populous and government. Conversely, in America, the major site of gun related deaths, the point of owning a gun is to be able to resist the government, and possibly the populous as well. Guns here are being used as a source of rebellion. The culture of rebelling through firearm use is solidified in the American constitution, which may or may not increase the incidence rate of firearm killings. I suspect the culture has more to do in a situation such as this. It's important to note that in Australia, where firearms did not, insofar as I'm aware, have an established culture, the banning of guns was able to effectively halt firearm killings. Take that as you will.

@seaberry you make excellent points and I agree. My posts over the past few weeks leading to this one concentrate on the physiological body response when violence is the issue. There's a million and one studies of the social aspects and the psychological input but they're just catching up when it comes what happens inside, chemically.
My work was simply to highlight the fact that there's more to it than we are generally told, and hopefully to get people talking and thinking.
I'd be interested to find out @krischik if physical abuse against children, vulnerable adults or even between bullies and rival gangs exist in Switzerland, as my point (as stated) focused on guns but the wider implications that the perceived "power" any weapon can offer was my true point. Any statistical input on that?

Thanks for reading and joining in both of you. I hope we all learn something. ...

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

physical abuse against children, vulnerable adults or even between bullies and rival gangs exist in Switzerland

Of course it exist as no country if free of darkness.

What I do know is that domestic abuse carries from one generation to the next. If you where abused as a child the likelihood of becoming abuser yourself increases.

Don't get me wrong: Most people are not abusers and being abused does not automatically make you an abuser. Just the likelihood increases.

Since you speak from the American perspective I suggest that you look into infant circumcision and aggression. There is possibility that the pain of infant circumcision is not forgotten after a week as the they make you believe but subconsciously remembered and, see above, increases your likelihood of becoming an abuser.

And since you are also speak about chemicals affecting the brain: Circumcision significantly reduces sexual pleasure. Which could lead to frustration and might make you look for alternatives means to gain a dopamine kick or make you more aggressive.

In Switzerland circumcision is almost unheard of.

I think you're getting off the point a little. I was not stating that psychology etc isn't in part responsible but that the basic cave man instincts and physiological actions and reactions are just as much a part in acts of violence ... for your additional information I am not American and and am interested in ALL aspects as a matter of personal interest. Have a look at my previous posts and i think you'll get where I'm coming from. For example the one on violent reactions from babies. .. who have never encountered violence.
It's an emotive subject and to make people think, consider and take on board additional information is the aim. If a person has their view and refuses to acknowledge that there may be other effects of any new information (in any subject) that is entirely up to that person.

I think the comments of circumcision is a little off topic and again from personal experience i can say not all of your statement is entirely a fact for everyone. .. but that is not a discussion to have on this post which is about the chemical response to using a weapon.
But i thank you for your input and information. It's always good to get other views. :)

The Swiss custom, insofar as I understand it, is to carry a rifle in case of invasion,

And to and from the range to do your mandatory training. You see armed people quite often on the road or public transport.

There is also a strong tradition of general sports shooting. But either way, it's indeed not a source of rebellion.

I'm aware, have an established culture, the banning of guns was able to effectively halt firearm killings.

Same for the UK. But UK now has a problem with knife killings. Now the UK bans knifes. But will that help when the underlying culture stays the same?

My question is not gun related. I am asking because you say you are from Switzerland? What can you tell me about Switzerland and its ability to remain "neutral" during times of war? I hate to have to be the one to say this, but, if Hitler (for example) had world domination on his mind, why would he ever have the heart to respect your country's desire to remain neutral? What does your country have that others do not? (besides being surrounded by mountains that may or may not be difficult to pass?) I am asking you this because I always thought it was a weird page from history. I mean, does the "owner of the world" live in your Country or something? Thank you in advance. <3

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Many people I spoke of mention the banks and that you don't attack your own bank.

However I don't think so. Switzerland has a militia. On the first glance this is similar to a conscripted reservists army. But there is one important difference: The Swiss militiamen keep there riffle and other military equipment at home.

Switzerland could have mobilised more then half a million armed men in in less then a day. And not just armed but also well trained. The Swiss militiamen have to do mandatory riffle training showing a that they can shoot there weapon with a certain minimum accuracy. Or redo your training until you can.

An accuracy a freshly conscripted soldier can't match. Especially since the Swiss riffles at the day where known for there accuracy. Switzerland still has sporting competition where only militia issued riffles are permitted. The Swiss take great pride in there accuracy.

Would you want to invade a country where half a million sharpshooters are waiting for you hidden behind every bush? Bushes in very difficult terrain. Remember :You have to leave your tank eventually. You can't live in tanks forever.

Mind you: Hitler would have still done it eventually if he had won WWII.

PS: I am a German expat living Switzerland but if Switzerland was attacked today I would take my riffle (yes I have one) and fight side by with the Swiss nationals to defend the country I have lived in for so many years.

Related link:

https://www.quora.com/How-strong-was-the-Swiss-Military-compared-to-the-Germans-during-World-War-2-Would-the-Swiss-have-been-able-to-resist-a-German-invasion

Thanks for the response and sharing that link. I will check it out. Yeah, I get ya now. The 3rd Reich was probably waiting until they had all of Europe, Asia and Africa conquered before trying to go for Switzerland. They would of probably needed that extra help.

Sounds like Switzerland may be my kind of place. Is it easy to get in there and become a Citizen? I am looking at options to get out of America before my family and I are killed by our own, violent Citizenry.

Thanks for sharing your experiences. Take care! <3

Really interesting and nostalgic post. I remember when in school we would often examine the parts of the brains that were most aroused by senses of adrenaline as well as fear and so on.

In this case, due to the release of endorphins, i would presume it can cause certain people to attain an ecstasy, but do think that those feelings could last for as long as a fight? Especially considering the physical aspect of the encounter?

This was overall a very eduforming read and i want to thank you for that. Keep up the good work !! :)

Thank you for reading and for your support. I began this journey for a personal search for a reason why - but the more I find out the more I learn and the more I want to learn. I enjoy sharing and receiving others' thoughts and ideas.

The secondary school I attended was a bit filled with students who love fights and cause violence all the time. At some point I had to fight and the first day I ever used a weapon to defend myself, I could feel a rush. My heartbeat increased. I felt it is bad but at the same time I was excited and feel like doing it again. I now know why I did that then.

@mr-aaron ... wow... Thank you for sharing that. That's amazing to read that someone, not just a test subject in a trial, can 1st hand say he knows what it feels like. I remember something similar when I picked up a gun. .. I was only shooting at clays but it felt "powerful". I guess the truth is that if we strip away or modern society we're all still cave men and women whether we like it or not and the sooner we understand that the sooner we can truly tackle issues of violence before they happen. Education and understanding. ....

I love your reply. I think its easy to take a man out of the cave (modernization) but it will be difficult to take the cave out of the man.

👍



This post has been voted on by the steemstem curation team and voting trail.

There is more to SteemSTEM than just writing posts, check here for some more tips on being a community member. You can also join our discord here to get to know the rest of the community!

Very well, I entertained myself a lot. Although my opinion is that we do not give the world weapons against us, because it will use them. There are no "good weapons" or "bad weapons". Any weapon in the hand of a bad person is bad. A weapon in the hand of a decent person poses no threat.Ideas are more powerful than weapons. We do not let our enemies have weapons, why would we let them have ideas?

I just want to understand one of your points a little more deeply. "We do not let our enemies have weapons.." what do you mean by that, exactly? From what I have seen, our "enemies", local and globally, are armed to the teeth. Furthermore, I put "enemies" in quotes for a reason. Who is your enemy, if I may ask? Thanks for speaking your mind. That is always fine in my book.

Or rather, OUR "enemy"?

Not to nitpick, but aren't some starting to think that dopamine is actually that which terminates the process of reward-seeking, instead of being the thing that causes it in the first place?

Not something I found in my research but something I will look into.
Thank you :)

:D

Dopamine is a reward, right?

It can still be considered a reward even if the mechanism is slightly different in the sense that it abates a sensation after it's released, imo.

Right? <3

Hmmm, that is strange. My boyfriend experiences none of these "thrilling" physiological changes when he is in a room with a gun or is offered a chance to hold a gun. He experiences quite the opposite. Then again, he has been falsely accused by Cops multiple times concerning multiple things and has had guns pointed at him with ill intent for no reason at all. Also, when he was a child, one of his best friend's brothers "freaked out" and held a knife up to his throat. Plus side? He avoids using violence to solve issues. As a woman, I feel that is a pretty healthy thing. I don't want my kids exposed to a bunch of "boners" "getting off" playing around with guns. They sure as hell aren't a toy. Thanks for sharing, by the way. I don't intend to condemn your love of weaponry, I just wanted to state that the thrills experienced with guns aren't shared with all humans. Hmmm, speaking of which? Would Jesus get a "boner" if we offered him a pistol? Lol.... Yeah, I like to find humor in all things. <3

Thank you for adding your / your partner's experience. Although it was obviously not good at the time it has made him a better person and example for the children.
I don't "love weaponry". In fact the opposite. This research and all my previous posts originally came about as I tried to understand why my father always beat me with some kind of object instead of a slap. In his rage a punch would've been understandable in the context of he had psyche and social issues but he always reached for a stick or shoe or belt etc.... I Always wondered why. Hence there must be more.
This information, like any, does not apply to every human, but it does explain why some things seem to be contrary to what is expected in certain situations.
I too turned my back on that way of being thankfully and I can get quite annoyed when the stock answer is violence leads to violence, abused will abuse. There's so much more to a person such as free will, but if we add the chemistry to the psychology and social effects some of it starts to make a better road to understanding and so changing things.
Thank you for joining in and respect to you and your family.

Thanks. Yeah, these cycles of violence can be difficult to recognize if you are caught in the middle of one of them but it is good to know some of us can see it enough to break the chain. Much love back and thanks for engaging me. I am sure we both have plenty more experiences to share on here. Best wishes! <3

👍❤

Very interesting read.
As a kid, the feeling that comes with holding a toy gun explains it all. Especially after seeing an action movie.
This is something that eventually grows with us, quietly.

That, my friend, is a very good point. I have to admit I never gave my children toy weapons of any kind nor allowed Action movies etc (some 30 plus years ago) yet still the first games they'd play when out with friends was involving "guns" even water guns, swords(robin hood and Richard the lion heart from school history) all kinds. .. it was like they were drawn to weapon play no matter what i did. Thankfully my (and their fathers) anti violence attitude dominated... But what the world gives to the futures of our children. .....!!
Thank you for engaging and responding. I hope you gained something from my research notes. :)

Wow... I see there's not so much one can do to contain these things with children. I appreciate you and your friends' efforts and I think it would help a great deal if that method is adopted by more parents.

I sure gained a lot.

Keep up the good work :)

I guess a gun can, to an extent, be described as the equivalent of a Gyges ring. Just as a person puts on the ring and reveals his true self because of the invincibility it grants him, so the person who takes a gun in his gun shows his true aggressive and oppressing colors.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

A good point well made. I think you've highlighted it well. If we modern cavemen have genetically developed a safety catch then we won't be affected but if the prehistoric juices still run through us then holding a weapon encourages the flow and all that goes with it. It's then up to our "learning" to keep us in check. I think I'll keep that in mind for a future post i have planned about genetic learning. Thank you for engaging and adding to my ideas. 😊