Heart Attacks - Part 1: What is a Heart Attack?

in steemstem •  7 years ago 

G'day Team,

Those who read my posts regularly will be familiar with my habit of setting out to write about 'x' and half an hour later deciding I first need to explain 'a' and 'b' in order to really give people the basics needed to understand why a discussion about 'x' is so important... so leading up to a discussion about detecting heart attacks... let's talk about what a heart attack is!

This will be a very basic introduction... medically trained fellows please don't crucify me, details will be covered in future updates (including further classes of MI).



heart-1767552_960_720.jpg
Image Source - Pixabay


The Heart

Luckily, I've already made a post about the basics of the anatomy of the heart and while I never got around to doing an advanced post, this is enough information for what we'll be chatting about today!

The most important thing to pay attention to are the coronary arteries, a network of vessels which supply blood to the heart itself. These are the arteries that are often responsible for heart attacks.

Atherosclerosis

The term atherosclerosis may sound a little complex, but its name pretty much gives it away. 'Athero' is a common medical prefix for 'vessel', and 'sclerosis' for 'harden' and that's quite literally what atherosclerosis is... hardening of our vessels. Now we won't go into the exact process here, but to put it simply, it involves the movement of lipids from our blood into our vessel walls leading to a build-up which can calcify.



800px-Endo_dysfunction_Athero.png
Image Source - wiki CC BY-SA 3.0


Atherosclerosis is a big problem because our body relies on the flexibility of our vessels to help blood flow freely and easily through our body. As our vessels harden they lose compliance and resist the flow of blood, in order to compensate our heart works harder and our blood pressure goes up! Increased blood pressure just accelerates the rate of atherosclerosis and the whole process feeds-back on itself.

But the issues don't end there... in fact, bad atherosclerosis can lead to significant build-ups in our vessels that are so thick they hinder or completely block the flow of blood. This is called an occlusive thrombus and, depending on where it is, can completely stop blood flow to a particular part of our body.

Alternatively, many thick atherosclerotic lesions are capped with a hard calcified cap. This calcified cap may break, leading to a rapid thickening of the lesions as the contents underneath spills out and blocks the vessel. This will either lead to a blockage of blood flow at this site or a breaking off of material which can lodge further along in other arteries. When this occlusive lesion travels and blocks a vessel further down from where it originated, it's called an embolism.

Heart Attacks

So this is where we are going to talk about 'Heart Attacks'... and it's going to be a really quick chat. Because, unfortunately, the medical profession doesn't really use the term 'Heart Attack'... that would be too simple and, honestly, it just isn't specific enough for what we want to know!

What most people are talking about when they say 'Hear Attack' is actually what we call a 'Myocardial Infarction' (MI)... so let's talk about MI!

Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction is another big term which boils down to have a really simple meaning! Our entire body relies on a good supply of oxygen in order to work, and when we can't supply tissue with oxygen they become starved, or ischaemic. Ischaemic tissue doesn't work properly, it lets off inflammatory signals and over time it begins to break down. Once the tissue has broken down enough to be 'beyond repair' (essentially dead) then we say it's 'infarcted'. 'Myocardium' is the term we use for heart muscle.

So myocardial infarction is the death of heart muscle, due to a reduction in oxygen supply.

But how does this happen?

Well, remember how we mentioned atherosclerotic lesions occasionally burst, spilling out their contents and rapidly thickening and occluding the vessels they are in. Well, this can occur in the arteries that supply blood to the heart (the coronary arteries) and when it does the ensuing lack of blood supply can result in a myocardial infarction. This is the most common mechanism for sudden myocardial infarctions, though it should be noted it's not the only one. Something we'll discuss more in Part II.

Consiquences

As the heart becomes increasingly starves of oxygen the muscle dies, which can lead to a number of problems. The dead muscle stops contracting properly, which may result in a failure of the heart to get blood to the brain, resulting in a person passing out. The dead tissue may cause problems with conduction of electrical signals too, which can lead to fatal arrhythmias or abnormal heart-beats. It's even possible for the dead heart tissue to 'blow-out' leading to a bleed out of the heart wall, which often results in sudden death.

Even if the initial attack is survived, there are long-term consequences of heart attacks too. The dead heart muscle may never recover and in it's weakened state the heart may never be able to pump blood properly again. This leads to a condition called heart failure.

Dead muscle tissue may continue to reak-havoc with electrical conduction through the heart and lead to arrhythmias, or the tissue that holds valves together may die resulting in valvular prolapse which can also cause heart failure.

The ultimate take-home is that the heart is a pump, with an important job and heart attacks can lead to a permanent reduction in the heart's capacity to do its job. While not everyone is so unlucky, it's possible that this reduction is so severe that even short-term recovery is not possible and these patients have few options left... but we'll discuss more on the specifics later

Thanks

Thanks for reading team, as usual I hope everyone learned something useful! Keep posted and please vote, re-steem or comment :)

Thanks

-tfc


Resources
Medscape - paywalled
UpToDate




steemstem

Get involved today!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Informative post, lots of people don’t totally understand how body systems work and it’s all interconnected. You did a nice job of explaining from arteries to heart along with how disease progresses. Thanks!

Thanks mate! It can be hard getting the point across, but after about Part XXXVII I'm sure we'll get there :P

It unnerves me that we still haven't reached the point where we can easily change bad parts with new ones, like we do with an old car.

What do you think will be most practical in the future: machine hearts; flesh and blood hearts made in labs and transplanted; or nanobots of some sort injected into our bodies repairing our tissues at the micro scale?

Thanks for the comment! This brings up two really good pointsI'm really passionate about... people frequently over-estimate how 'good' modern medicine is & replacing organs.

  1. For emergency conditions we're really awesome, if we can stabilize or fix a big problem in someone who's otherwise healthy then they'll do really well. But for chronic conditions, our option are still very limited. Most of the medications for heart failure, for example, fix the underlying issue by slowing down the heart and reducing blood pressure. But this doesn't FIX the issue... it just addresses the symptoms. In a lot of ways we've very little to help us HEAL chronic problems, we're just really good at preventing them from killing us!

Finally a huge majority of the patients we treat are very old... if an 80 year old with a 20 year history of hypertension, diabetes and heart disease who's bed-bound comes into a clinic with a heart attack, we can't do surgery. For a lot of patients who're elderly (which is most patients in a hospital) surgery is simply too risky! So medical options are the only options.

  1. In terms of replacements for hearts, we've got a few basic options...
  • human-> human transplant (alograft)
  • animal -> human transplants (zenograft)
  • machine heart
  • stem-cell grown heart
  • hybrid

We can do human to human, but it requires a healthy recipient and a donor who fits some really narrow specifications... so not very efficient in terms of a 'go-to'

Animal to human is not feasible, as the human body rejects the animal tissue.

Machine hearts have been in development for a while now, and they're being used successfully... putting any foreign object in the body carries with it some big risk factors. The ones that really hold this technology back are the risk of infection, and the risk of a clot. Because the metal/ plastic that's put in the body is not biologically active it acts as a really good host-site for prospective organisms to settle on and start growing.

Stem-cell grown hearts are my personal favourite options... but the process of growing a heart is actually quite complex. While it's often described as a simple mass of muscle, the heart actually has a super-complex fibrous skeleton that allows it to contract on a sort of twisty/ rotational axis and 'squish' blood out very efficiently. So we'd have to replicate and lay down this fibrous tissue first. Next we'd have to lay down cardiomyocytes (heart muscle cells) with an effective vasculature. The blood supply IN to the heart muscle is pretty easy.. it comes through the coronary arteries. The drainage of that blood OUT of the heart muscle is a bit more complex... about 2/3 drains into a venous system that meets in a coronary sinus at the back of the heart and enters the right atrium... on the other hand about 1/3 drains DIRECTLY INTO THE HEART CHAMBERS... which would just be so complex to engineer. Finally we'd have to set up the hearts conduction system. The natural conduction is pretty complex and requires the movement of the electrical pulse from atria to ventricles in a well-timed fashion to prevent a circular excitation called re-entrant circuits which'll lead to arrhythmia. I don't know how this could be replicated in a designed heart.

All of the above is assuming we can engineer the proper stem cells to create each of the cell types we need (which we can't do well yet)... and then get them all to grow and cooperate in a friendly fashion. This is where hybrid comes in. I think our best option going forward is utilizing the benefits of a hybdrid mechanical/ stem cell grown model. it would mean we could put a musclular heart on a synthetic skeleton with a pacemaker. It's not a heart replacement because there'd be no homeostatic feedback to regulate heart rate and contractility, but we'd get a good 'basic heart' for those who just want to keep ticking along.

Sorry for the essay :P

Really good comprehensive response!

The complexity of it does make it seem though like finding a way to convince the body to repair itself, possibly using stem cells, would be the better option. The body must 'rust' and die, even though the germ line is immortal which means it does have the capacity to regenerate in a way.

You're right... but again it's so complex! There is one group I know of that are programming myocardial cells and then injecting them into dead tissue after heart attacks. Unfortunately, while they survive and thrive, the don't beat really well!

Nice Article Thanks for sharing the Knowledge and Keep The good work for read fitness articles please follow me #bicepsforever

Thanks

very good and useful, thank you